ArticleThe oncologist2011
Discontinuing bevacizumab in patients with glioblastoma: an ethical analysis.
Article in The oncologist, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hypofractionated radiation therapy versus chemotherapy with temozolomide in patients affected by RPA class V and VI glioblastoma: a randomized phase II trial.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2019Trial
- Phase II trial of continuous low-dose temozolomide for patients with recurrent malignant glioma.Neuro-oncology · 2013Trial
- The complementary role of MRI and FET PET in high-grade gliomas to differentiate recurrence from radionecrosis.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2023Article
- Post-bevacizumab Clinical Outcomes and the Impact of Early Discontinuation of Bevacizumab in Patients with Recurrent Malignant Glioma.Cancer research and treatment · 2017Article
- Perspectives of Medical Specialists on Sharing Decisions in Cancer Care: A Qualitative Study Concerning Chemotherapy Decisions With Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma.The oncologist · 2015Article
- Bevacizumab for glioblastoma-a promising drug or not?Cancers · 2013Article
- Re-irradiation with and without bevacizumab as salvage therapy for recurrent or progressive high-grade gliomas.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2013Article
- Response assessment in recurrent glioblastoma treated with irinotecan-bevacizumab: comparative analysis of the Macdonald, RECIST, RANO, and RECIST + F criteria.Neuro-oncology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly lethal malignant brain tumor that expresses proangiogenic factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Bevacizumab (Avastin®; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA), a monoclonal antibody against VEGF, is routinely used in the U.S. to treat GBM patients whose tumors have progressed following initial therapy. The Ethics Advisory Committee at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute was asked to provide consultation on two cases involving patients with recurrent GBM who were receiving bevacizumab. Despite evidence of disease progression, family members advocated for the continued use of bevacizumab because of its mild toxicity profile and concern that discontinuation would impair quality of life. However, continuing bevacizumab in this setting posed physical and financial risks to the patients and raised ethical concerns about resource allocation and justice. We analyze the ethical questions regarding bevacizumab discontinuation in the setting of progressive GBM. We articulate the potential benefits and harms of continuing the drug and identify guiding principles for drug discontinuation that should be made transparent to patients and families. With the increasing availability of new, modestly toxic, expensive drugs for patients with advanced cancer, questions of when to stop these drugs will become increasingly relevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.