Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21948391›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2011

Analyses of longitudinal, hospital clinical laboratory data with application to blood glucose concentrations.

Jonathan S Schildcrout, Sebastien Haneuse, Josh F Peterson, Joshua C Denny, Michael E Matheny, Lemuel R Waitman, Randolph A Miller

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan S SchildcroutDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA. jonathan.schildcrout@vanderbilt.edu
Sebastien Haneuse
Josh F Peterson
Joshua C Denny
Michael E Matheny
Lemuel R Waitman
Randolph A Miller
Vanderbilt University · USGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · USHarvard University · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

Outcome Dependent Sampling Studies of Longitudinal Data: Design and AnalysisR01HL094786 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jonathan Scott Schildcrout · 2009 to 2026
$6.1M
TIME:(Tools for Inpatient Monitoring using Evidence)for Safe &AppropriateTestingR01LM007995 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, RANDOLPH A · 2004 to 2009
$2.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL094786NLM NIH HHS R01 LM007995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic medical record (EMR) systems afford researchers with opportunities to investigate a broad range of scientific questions. In contrast to purposeful study designs, however, EMR data acquisition procedures typically do not align with any specific hypothesis. Subsequent investigations therefore require detailed characterization of clinical procedures and protocols that underlie EMR data, as well as careful consideration of model choice. For example, many intensive care units currently implement insulin infusion protocols to better control patients' blood glucose levels. The protocols use prior glucose levels to determine, in part, how to adjust the infusion rate. Such feedback loops introduce time-dependent confounding into longitudinal analyses even though they may not always be evident to the analyst. In this paper, we review commonly used longitudinal model specifications and interpretations and show how these are particularly important in the presence of hospital-based clinical protocols. We show that parameter relationships among various models can be used to identify and characterize the impact of time-dependent confounding and therefore help explain seemingly incongruous conclusions. We also review important estimation challenges in the presence of time-dependent confounding and show how certain model specifications may be more or less susceptible to bias. To illustrate these points, we present a detailed analysis of the relationship between blood glucose levels and insulin doses on the basis of data from an intensive care unit.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsLongitudinal StudiesModels, StatisticalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlood GlucoseFemaleHumansInsulinIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultBlood GlucoseInsulin

Identifiers

PMID21948391
PMCPMC3339442
OpenAlexW1902066699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.