ArticlePharmaceutical research2012
Preclinical pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of human papillomavirus DNA vaccine delivered in human endogenous retrovirus envelope-coated baculovirus vector.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Biodistribution Study of Baculoviral and Adenoviral Vector Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Tissue-specific Calibration of Real-time PCR Facilitates Absolute Quantification of Plasmid DNA in Biodistribution Studies.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2016Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTest pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of a human papillomavirus(HPV)16L1 DNA vaccine delivered in human endogenous retrovirus envelope protein (HERV)-expressing baculovirus (AcHERV) and those of naked plasmid vaccine.
methodHPV16L1 gene was administrated as a naked plasmid or in AcHERV to mice via intravenous and intramuscular routes. HPV16L1 gene was extracted and assayed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, which was determined to have a detection limit of 50 copies/µg genomic DNA..
resultsMean residence times of HPV16L1 in AcHERV were 4.8- and 272.2-fold higher than naked HPV16L1 DNA vaccines after intramuscular and intravenous administration, respectively. Naked HPV16L1 DNA levels 1 month after injection were >3 orders of magnitude lower in each tissue tested than AcHERV-delivered HPV16L1, which was retained in most tissues without specific tissue tropism. AcHERV-delivered HPV16L1 administered intramuscularly persisted at the injection sites. However, the levels of copy numbers in muscle were low (1,800/μg genomic DNA) after 1 month, and undetectable after 6 months.
conclusionsHPV16L1 delivered via AcHERV resides longer in the body than HPV16L1 in naked form. The lack of tissue tropism ensures the safety of AcHERV vectors for further development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.