Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21947978›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2012

Electrocardiographic changes during vasodilator SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: does it affect diagnosis or prognosis?

Talhat Azemi, Mridula Rai, Purvi Parwani, Sarkis Baghdasarian, Fawad Kazi, Alan W Ahlberg, Giselle Cyr, Deborah Katten, David O'Sullivan, Daniel Fram and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Abnormal vasodilator stress electrocardiogram with normal myocardial perfusion: Clinical decision-making and review of literature.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Review
  2. Examining a novel threshold for defining electrocardiographic ischemia with vasodilator stress.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  3. Prognostic significance of ischemic electrocardiographic changes with regadenoson stress myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  4. Myocardial stunning by gated SPECT: An old tool reinvented in a stunning turn.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Article
  5. The prognostic value of non-perfusion variables obtained during vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2016
    Review
  6. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of ischemic electrocardiographic changes with regadenoson-stress myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2015
    Article
  7. The vasodilator stress ECG: should depression cause anxiety?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2012
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Talhat AzemiNuclear Cardiology Laboratory, Henry Low Heart Center, Division of Cardiology, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT 06102, USA. tazemi@harthosp.org
Mridula Rai
Purvi Parwani
Sarkis Baghdasarian
Fawad Kazi
Alan W Ahlberg
Giselle Cyr
Deborah Katten
David O'Sullivan
Daniel Fram
Gary V Heller
Hartford Hospital · USHartford Financial Services (United States)University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSignificance of electrocardiographic (ECG) changes during vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is controversial. We examined the diagnostic and prognostic significance of ECG changes during vasodilator single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) MPI.

methodsWe studied consecutive patients who underwent vasodilator SPECT MPI from 1995 to 2009. Patients with baseline ECG abnormalities, previous history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery or myocardial infarction (MI) were excluded. Significant coronary artery disease (CAD) was defined as >70% stenosis of any vessel or ≥50% stenosis of left main. Mean follow-up was 2.4 ± 1.5 years for cardiac events (cardiac death and non-fatal MI).

resultsOf patients in the diagnostic cohort, ST depression was associated with increased incidence of CAD with abnormal (P = .020 and P <.001) but not in those with normal perfusion (P = .342). Of 3,566 patients with follow-up in the prognostic cohort, including 130 (5.0%) with ST depression and normal perfusion, the presence of ST depression ≥1 mm did not affect the outcomes in any summed stress score category.

conclusionsST depression ≥1 mm during vasodilator SPECT MPI is associated with CAD in patients with abnormal perfusion, but provides no additional risk stratification beyond concomitant perfusion imaging, including those with normal studies.

Indexed as

AdenosineDipyridamoleAgedConnecticutCoronary Artery DiseaseElectrocardiographyExercise TestFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial Perfusion ImagingPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAdenosineDipyridamoleVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID21947978
OpenAlexW2047057747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.