Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21947955›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2011

Integration of genetic and physical maps of the chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genome using flow-sorted chromosomes.

Pavlína Zatloukalová, Eva Hřibová, Marie Kubaláková, Pavla Suchánková, Hana Simková, Cabrera Adoración, Günter Kahl, Teresa Millán, Jaroslav Doležel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. InterstitialPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Chromosome and Genome Diversity in the GenusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  4. Chromosome analysis and sorting.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Chromosomes in the flow to simplify genome analysis.Functional & integrative genomics · 2012
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pavlína ZatloukalováInstitute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Sokolovská 6, 77200 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Eva Hřibová
Marie Kubaláková
Pavla Suchánková
Hana Simková
Cabrera Adoración
Günter Kahl
Teresa Millán
Jaroslav Doležel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cultivated chickpea is the third most important legume after field bean and garden pea worldwide. Despite considerable breeding towards improved yield and resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses, the production of chickpea remained stagnant, but molecular tools are expected to increase the impact of current improvement programs. As a first step towards this goal, various genetic linkage maps have been established and markers linked to resistance genes been identified. However, until now, only one linkage group (LG) has been assigned to a specific chromosome. In the present work, mitotic chromosomes were sorted using flow cytometry and used as template for PCR with primers designed for genomic regions flanking microsatellites. These primers amplify sequence-tagged microsatellite site markers. This approach confirmed the assignment of LG8 to the smallest chromosome H. For the first time, LG5 was linked to the largest chromosome A, LG4 to a medium-sized chromosome E, while LG3 was anchored to the second largest chromosome B. Chromosomes C and D could not be flow-sorted separately and were jointly associated to LG6 and LG7. By the same token, chromosomes F and G were anchored to LG1 and LG2. To establish a set of preferably diagnostic cytogenetic markers, the genomic distribution of various probes was verified using FISH. Moreover, a partial genomic bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library was constructed and putative single/low-copy BAC clones were mapped cytogenetically. As a result, two clones were identified localizing specifically to chromosomes E and H, for which no cytogenetic markers were yet available.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialChromosomes, PlantCicerCytogeneticsDNA, PlantFlow CytometryGenetic LinkageGenetic MarkersGenome, PlantIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescencePolymerase Chain ReactionDNA, PlantGenetic Markers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.