ArticleClinical oral investigations2012
Microleakage of silorane- and methacrylate-based class V composite restorations.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical evaluation of restorations made of ELS extra low shrinkage versus APT advanced polymer technology resin composite: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial up to 3 years.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- Alternative Direct Restorative Materials for Dental Amalgam: A Concise Review Based on an FDI Policy Statement.International dental journal · 2024Review
- Review
- Low-Shrinkage Resin Matrices in Restorative Dentistry-Narrative Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- The Effect of Occlusal Loading on Gingival Microleakage of Bulk Fill Composites Compared with a Conventional Composite.Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran) · 2020Article
- Evaluation of Enamel and Dentinal Microleakage in Class II Silorane-Based and Methacrylate-Based Resin Composite Restorations Using Specific and Nonspecific Adhesives.Journal of dentistry (Tehran, Iran) · 2018Article
- In vitro effects of hydroxyapatite containing toothpastes on dentin permeability after multiple applications and ageing.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Marginal integrity of low-shrinking versus methacrylate-based composite: effect of different one-step self-etch adhesives.Odontology · 2017Article
- The effect of repeated preheating of dimethacrylate and silorane-based composite resins on marginal gap of class V restorations.Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2017Article
- Effect of Lactic Acid on Microleakage of Class V Low-Shrinkage Composite Restorations.Journal of dentistry (Tehran, Iran) · 2016Article
- A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Two Low-Shrinkage Composites with a Conventional Resin Composite: an In Vitro Assessment.Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran) · 2016Article
- Surface Roughness, Microhardness, and Microleakage of a Silorane-Based Composite Resin after Immediate or Delayed Finishing/Polishing.International journal of dentistry · 2016Article
- The use of micro-CT with image segmentation to quantify leakage in dental restorations.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2015Article
- Effect of Air Abrasion Preconditioning on Microleakage in Class V Restorations Under Cyclic Loading: An In-vitro Study.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2014Article
- Marginal Microleakage of Low-shrinkage Composite Silorane in Primary Teeth: An In Vitro Study.Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2012Article
- Effect of cyclic loading on microleakage of silorane based composite compared with low shrinkage methacrylate-based composites.Dental research journalArticle
- A 1-year comparative evaluation of clinical performance of nanohybrid composite with Activa™ bioactive composite in Class II carious lesion: A randomized control study.Journal of conservative dentistry : JCDArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The marginal integrity of class V restorations in a silorane- and a group of methacrylate-based composite resins with varying viscosities was tested in the present study. Different adhesives (OptiBond FL, KerrHawe; AdheSE One, Vivadent; or Silorane System Adhesive, 3M ESPE) were applied to 168 standardized class V cavities. The cavities (n = 12) were filled with a wide range of different viscous composite resins: Filtek Silorane, 3M ESPE; els and els flow, Saremco; Tetric EvoCeram and Tetric EvoFlow, Vivadent; Grandio, Voco; and Ultraseal XT Plus, Ultradent. Microleakage of the restoration was assessed by dye penetration (silver staining) on multiple sections with and without thermocycling and mechanical loading (TCML: 5,000 × 5-55°C; 30 s/cycle; 500,000 × 72.5 N, 1.6 Hz). Data were statistically analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test and the Error Rates Method (ERM). The silorane-based composite resin yielded the lowest dye penetration after TCML. Microleakage of methacrylate-based composite restorations, in general (ERM), was statistically significantly influenced by the adhesive system, Moreover, dye penetration at enamel margins was significantly lower than dye penetration at dentin margins. The chemical basis of composite resins and adjacent tooth substance seems to strongly influence marginal sealing of class V restorations for methacrylate-based materials. Moreover, the steps of dental adhesives used affected marginal integrity. The silorane-based composite resin evaluated in the present study exhibits the best marginal seal. The three-step adhesive yielded better marginal sealing than the one-step adhesive for methacrylate-based class V composite restorations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21947906What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.