Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21947657›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2012

Development and psychometric evaluation of the public health surveillance well-being scale.

C M Bann, R Kobau, M A Lewis, M M Zack, C Luncheon, W W Thompson

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03645512 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Resilience Intervention for Critical Care Nurses

TypeinterventionalSponsorAdventHealthRan2018 to 2019Enrolled108ConditionsStressArmsCorporate Athlete Resilience (CAR) Training Program
NCT03645707 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Resilience Intervention With Psychoeducational Sessions for Critical Care Nurses

TypeinterventionalSponsorAdventHealthRan2018 to 2019Enrolled20ConditionsStressArmsCAR Training and Psychoeducational Sessions
NCT04952441 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Controlled Trial of the RISE Program for Nurses

TypeinterventionalSponsorAdventHealthRan2019 to 2021Enrolled126ConditionsStress, PsychologicalArmsRISE Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Social Isolation in Older Adults: A Qualitative Study on the Social Dimensions of Group Outdoor Health Walks.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Who Is Happier in China? Exploring Determinant Factors Using Religion as a Moderator.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  10. To bin or not to bin? A comparison of symptom frequency response formats in the assessment of health-related quality of life.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Monitoring population health for Healthy People 2020: evaluation of the NIH PROMIS® Global Health, CDC Healthy Days, and satisfaction with life instruments.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2013
    Article
  16. Person-centered Health Promotion in Chronic Disease.International journal of person centered medicine · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

C M BannRTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194, USA. cmb@rti.org
R Kobau
M A Lewis
M M Zack
C Luncheon
W W Thompson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop and psychometrically evaluate the brief Public Health Surveillance Well-Being Scale (PHS-WB) that captures mental, physical, and social components of well-being.

methodsUsing data from 5,399 HealthStyles survey respondents, we conducted bi-factor, item response theory, and differential item functioning analyses to examine the psychometric properties of a pool of 34 well-being items. Based on the statistical results and content considerations, we developed a brief 10-item well-being scale and assessed its construct validity through comparisons of demographic subgroups and correlations with measures of related constructs.

resultsBased on the bi-factor analyses, the items grouped into both an overall factor and individual domain-specific factors. The PHS-WB scale demonstrated good internal consistency (alpha = 0.87) and correlated highly with scores for the entire item pool (r = 0.94). The well-being scale scores differed as expected across demographic groups and correlated with global and domain-specific measures of similar constructs, supporting its construct validity.

conclusionThe 10-item PHS-WB scale demonstrates good psychometric properties, and its high correlation with the item pool suggests minimal loss of information with the use of fewer items. The brief PHS-WB allows for well-being assessment on national surveys or in other situations where a longer form may not be feasible.

Indexed as

PsychometricsPublic Health SurveillanceQuality of LifeAdultFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.