Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21947602›Full record

ArticleChromosoma2012

A cross-species comparison of escape from X inactivation in Eutheria: implications for evolution of X chromosome inactivation.

Shafagh Al Nadaf, Janine E Deakin, Clément Gilbert, Terence J Robinson, Jennifer A M Graves, Paul D Waters

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosoma, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Genes that escape from X-chromosome inactivation: Potential contributors to Klinefelter syndrome.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. IQSEC2-related encephalopathy in males and females: a comparative study including 37 novel patients.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Escape From X-Chromosome Inactivation: An Evolutionary Perspective.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  11. Review
  12. X-Chromosome Inactivation and Escape from X Inactivation in Mouse.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2018
    Article
  13. When the Lyon(ized chromosome) roars: ongoing expression from an inactive X chromosome.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Variable escape from X-chromosome inactivation: identifying factors that tip the scales towards expression.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2014
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shafagh Al NadafEvolution Ecology and Genetics, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, ACT 2601, Canberra, Australia. shafagh.alnadaf@anu.edu.au
Janine E Deakin
Clément Gilbert
Terence J Robinson
Jennifer A M Graves
Paul D Waters
Australian National University · AUStellenbosch University · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex chromosome dosage compensation in both eutherian and marsupial mammals is achieved by X chromosome inactivation (XCI)--transcriptional repression that silences one of the two X chromosomes in the somatic cells of females. We recently used RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) to show, in individual nuclei, that marsupial X inactivation (in the absence of XIST) occurs on a gene-by-gene basis, and that escape from inactivation is stochastic and independent of gene location. In the absence of similar data from fibroblast cell lines of eutherian representatives, a meaningful comparison is lacking. We therefore used RNA-FISH to examine XCI in fibroblast cell lines obtained from three distantly related eutherian model species: African savannah elephant (Loxodonta africana), mouse (Mus musculus) and human (Homo sapiens). We show that, unlike the orthologous marsupial X, inactivation of the X conserved region (XCR) in eutherians generally is complete. Two-colour RNA-FISH on female human, mouse and elephant interphase nuclei showed that XCR loci have monoallelic expression in almost all nuclei. However, we found that many loci located in the evolutionarily distinct recently added region (XAR) displayed reproducible locus-specific frequencies of nuclei with either one or two active X alleles. We propose that marsupial XCI retains features of an ancient incomplete silencing mechanism that was augmented by the evolution of the XIST gene that progressively stabilized the eutherian XCR. In contrast, the recently added region of the eutherian X displays an incomplete inactivation profile similar to that observed on the evolutionarily distinct marsupial X and the independently evolved monotreme X chromosomes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsCell LineElephantsEukaryotaFemaleGene Expression RegulationHumansInterphaseMaleMiceRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, UntranslatedSpecies SpecificityX ChromosomeX Chromosome InactivationRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, UntranslatedXIST non-coding RNA

Identifiers

PMID21947602
PMCPMC3260438
OpenAlexW2166619420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.