Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21947389›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2011

Randomized, double-blind, phase II, multicenter study evaluating the safety/tolerability and efficacy of JNJ-Q2, a novel fluoroquinolone, compared with linezolid for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection.

Paul Covington, J Michael Davenport, David Andrae, William O'Riordan, Lisa Liverman, Gail McIntyre, June Almenoff

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Linezolid-associated serotonin toxicity: a systematic review.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Treatment of MRSA Infection: Where are We?Current medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Early Response in Cellulitis: A Prospective Study of Dynamics and Predictors.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Pipeline of Known Chemical Classes of Antibiotics.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2013
    Review
  10. Investigational antimicrobial agents of 2013.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2013
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paul CovingtonFuriex Pharmaceuticals Inc, 3900 Paramount Parkway, Suite 150, Morrisville, North Carolina 27560, USA. Paul.Covington@furiex.com
J Michael Davenport
David Andrae
William O'Riordan
Lisa Liverman
Gail McIntyre
June Almenoff

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

JNJ-Q2 is a fluoroquinolone with broad coverage including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). A double-blind, multicenter, phase II noninferiority study treated 161 patients for 7 to 14 days, testing the efficacy of JNJ-Q2 (250 mg, twice a day [BID]) versus linezolid (600 mg, BID) in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). The prespecified criterion for noninferiority was 15%. Primary intent-to-treat analysis was unable to declare noninferiority, as the risk difference lower bound of the 95% confidence interval between treatments was 19% at 36 to 84 h postrandomization for the composite end point of lesion assessment and temperature. Prespecified clinical cure rates 2 to 14 days after completion of therapy were similar (83.1% for JNJ-Q2 versus 82.1% for linezolid). Post hoc analyses revealed that JNJ-Q2 was statistically noninferior to linezolid (61.4% versus 57.7%, respectively; P = 0.024) based on the 2010 FDA guidance, which defines treatment success as lack of lesion spread and afebrile status within 48 to 72 h postrandomization. Despite evidence of systemic disease, <5% of patients presented with fever, suggesting fever is not a compelling surrogate measure of systemic disease resolution for this indication. Nausea and vomiting were the most common adverse events. Of the patients, 86% (104/121) had S. aureus isolated from the infection site; 63% of these were MRSA. The results suggest JNJ-Q2 shows promise as an effective treatment for ABSSSI, demonstrating (i) efficacy for early clinical response (i.e., lack of spread of lesions and absence of fever at 48 to 72 h), and (ii) cure rates for ABSSSI pathogens (especially MRSA) consistent with the historical literature.

Indexed as

AcetamidesFluoroquinolonesOxazolidinonesAdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLinezolidMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMiddle AgedSkin Diseases, BacterialSoft Tissue Infections7-(3-(2-amino-1-fluoroethylidene)-1-piperidinyl)-1-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-1,4-dihydro-8-methoxy-4-oxo-3-quinolinecarboxylic acidAcetamidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsFluoroquinolonesLinezolidOxazolidinones

Identifiers

PMID21947389
PMCPMC3232810
OpenAlexW2105550949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.