Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21947316›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2012

Effects of amphetamine on reactivity to emotional stimuli.

Margaret C Wardle, Harriet de Wit

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Effects of MDMA and Intranasal oxytocin on social and emotional processing.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2014
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol on evaluation of emotional images.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2012
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Amping up effort: effects of d-amphetamine on human effort-based decision-making.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2011
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Derationalizing Delusions.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Distinct acute effects of LSD, MDMA, and D-amphetamine in healthy subjects.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Article
  18. The Supplement AdulterantThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Margaret C WardleDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, MC 3077, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL, USA.
Harriet de Wit

Funding

Determinants of Drug Preference in Humans--Administrative SupplementR01DA002812 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DE WIT, HARRIET · 1985 to 2024
$10.6M
NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOLGY TRG FOR DRUG ABUSE RESEARCHT32DA007255 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI VEZINA, PAUL R · 1991 to 2012
$5.9M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA002812NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA02812NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleMost studies of the reinforcing effects of stimulants have focused on the drugs' capacity to induce positive mood (i.e., euphoria). However, recent findings suggest drugs may also alter emotional reactivity to external stimuli, and that this may occur independently of direct effects on mood.

objectivesWe aimed to examine effects of D: -amphetamine, a prototypic stimulant, on self-reported and psychophysiological reactivity to emotional stimuli as well as overall subjective mood. We predicted that amphetamine would enhance reactivity to pleasant stimuli, particularly, stimuli with social content and that these effects would be independent of the drug's direct effects on mood.

methodsOver three sessions, 36 healthy normal adults received placebo, D: -amphetamine 10 and 20 mg under counterbalanced double-blind conditions. At each session, emotional reactivity to standardized positive, neutral, and negative pictures with and without social content was measured in self-reports and facial muscles sensitive to emotional state. Drug effects on cardiovascular variables and subjective mood were also measured.

resultsAmphetamine produced euphoria, feelings of drug effect, and increased blood pressure. Most notably, amphetamine enhanced self-reported positive reactions to all pictures and psychophysiological reactions to positive pictures. These effects were not significantly related to drug-induced mood changes. Contrary to our hypothesis, effects of amphetamine on emotional reactivity were not moderated by social content.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates a previously unexamined and potentially reinforcing effect of stimulant drugs in humans, distinct from more typically measured euphorigenic effects, and suggests new areas of research in stimulant abuse risk and adaptations occurring during drug dependence.

Indexed as

AdultAffectBlood PressureCentral Nervous System StimulantsDextroamphetamineDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodEmotionsEuphoriaFacial MusclesFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultCentral Nervous System StimulantsDextroamphetamine

Identifiers

PMID21947316
PMCPMC3277682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.