Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21947272›Full record

Trial reportPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2012

Mycophenolate mofetil for steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome: a phase II Bayesian trial.

Véronique Baudouin, Corinne Alberti, Anne-Laure Lapeyraque, Albert Bensman, Jean-Luc André, Françoise Broux, Mathilde Cailliez, Stéphane Decramer, Patrick Niaudet, Georges Deschênes and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Treating the idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: are steroids the answer?Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Mycophenolate mofetil for sustained remission in nephrotic syndrome.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Evaluation of Mycophenolate Mofetil and Low-Dose Steroid Combined Therapy in Moderately Severe Henoch-Schönlein Purpura Nephritis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Véronique BaudouinAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Robert Debré, Pediatric Nephrology Department, Université Paris 7, 48 Boulevard Sérurier, 75019, Paris, France.
Corinne Alberti
Anne-Laure Lapeyraque
Albert Bensman
Jean-Luc André
Françoise Broux
Mathilde Cailliez
Stéphane Decramer
Patrick Niaudet
Georges Deschênes
Evelyne Jacqz-Aigrain
Chantal Loirat
Hôpital Robert-Debré · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRHôpital Charles-Nicolle · FRHôpital de la Timone · FRHôpital des Enfants · FRHôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as a new therapeutic option in steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS). We conducted a phase II Bayesian trial of MMF in children with SDNS. Phase II trials, usually single-arm studies, investigate the effect of new treatments. Standard Fleming's procedure relies on observed results (relapse rate during the trial), whereas Bayesian approach combines observed results with prior information (expected relapse rate according to prior studies and clinical experience). All patients were required to have received prior alkylating-agent treatment. Sixty-seven percent of them had also received levamisole. Patients received MMF (1,200 mg/m(2)/day) and prednisone according to a defined schedule [reduction of alternate-day (e.o.d) dose to 50% of pre-MMF dose at 3 months, 25% at 6 months]. Twenty-four children (median age 6.0 years, 2.8-14.4) entered the study and 23 completed it. Bayesian analysis showed that adding four patients would not change significance of results, allowing stopping inclusions. Four patients relapsed during the first 6 months (estimated probability 17.6%, 95% credibility interval: 5.4-35.0%) and two at months 8 and 11.5. In the 19 patients free of relapse during the first 6 months, median (Q1-Q3) prednisone maintenance dose decreased from 25 (10-44) to 9 (7.5-11.2) mg/m(2) e.o.d (p < 0.001) and cumulative dose from 459 (382-689) to 264 (196-306) mg/m(2)/month (p < 0.001) before and on MMF respectively. Pre-MMF patient characteristics and MMF pharmacokinetics did not differ between patients with or without relapse. MMF reduces relapse rate and steroid dose in children with SDNS and should be proposed before cyclosporine and cyclophosphamide.

Indexed as

AdolescentArea Under CurveBayes TheoremChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMycophenolic AcidNephrotic SyndromePrednisoneProspective StudiesImmunosuppressive AgentsMycophenolic AcidPrednisone

Identifiers

PMID21947272
OpenAlexW2093007274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.