Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21947256›Full record

ReviewPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2012

Newborn screening and renal disease: where we have been; where we are now; where we are going.

J Lawrence Merritt, David Askenazi, Si Houn Hahn

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 90% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J Lawrence MerrittDivision of Genetic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, 4800 Sand Point Way, MS: B-6594, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.
David Askenazi
Si Houn Hahn
Seattle Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Newborn screening (NBS) has rapidly changed since its origins in the 1960s. Beginning with a single condition, then a handful in the 1990 s, NBS has expanded in the past decade to allow the detection of many disorders of amino-acid, organic-acid, and fatty-acid metabolism. These conditions often present with recurrent acute attacks of metabolic acidosis, hypoglycemia, liver failure, and hyperammonemia that may be prevented with initiation of early treatment. Renal disease is an important component of these disorders and is a frequent source of morbidity. Hemodialysis is often required for hyperammonemia in the organic acidemias and urea-cycle disorders. Rhabdomyolysis with renal failure is a frequent complication in fatty-acid oxidation disorders. Newer screening methods are under investigation to detect lysosomal storage diseases, primary immunodeficiencies, and primary renal disorders. These advances will present many challenges to nephrologists and pediatricians with respect to closely monitoring and caring for children with such disorders.

Indexed as

Early DiagnosisHumansInfant, NewbornKidney DiseasesMetabolism, Inborn ErrorsNeonatal Screening

Identifiers

PMID21947256
OpenAlexW2025179689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.