Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21947225›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2012

The Munich Diagnostic and Predictor Study of Dizziness: objectives, design, and methods.

C Lahmann, P Henningsen, M Dieterich, R Feuerecker, C A Cyran, G Schmid

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

C LahmannDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Langerstr. 3, 81675 Munich, Germany. lahmann@tum.de
P Henningsen
M Dieterich
R Feuerecker
C A Cyran
G Schmid

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This report describes the objectives, design, and methods of the Munich Diagnostic and Predictor Study of Dizziness, a prospective study investigating diagnostic subgroups, correlates, and predictors of dizziness that is not sufficiently explained medically but clearly related to a psychiatric disorder. All patients presenting at the Integrated Centre for Research and Treatment of Vertigo, Balance and Ocular Motor Disorders at the University Hospital Großhadern in Munich, Germany, are investigated during their first-time visit. The study consists of a baseline and two follow-up assessment points at 6 and 12 months. At the baseline assessment point, all participants complete self-rated questionnaires concerning dizziness, depression, anxiety, dissociative and traumatic experiences, somatization, body sensations and perception, cognitions, attachment, personality, quality of life and experiences with the health care system. Additionally, a structured clinical interview is conducted to assess mental disorders. Then, the neurologists complete questionnaires regarding the subjective doctor-patient relationship and to document the somatic diagnoses and results. The follow-up measurements consist of self-rated questionnaires. This study aims to improve the diagnosis and treatment of patients who suffer from dizziness related to a psychiatric disorder and who are often severely impaired in their working and daily lives.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultDizzinessFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesVertigo

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.