Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21947118›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Nephrology2011

Peritoneal dialysis in children with end-stage renal disease.

Franz Schaefer, Bradley A Warady

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis outcomes.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2022
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Unconventional T cells and kidney disease.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Franz SchaeferDivision of Pediatric Nephrology, Center for Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Im Neuenheimer Feld 430, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. franz.schaefer@med.uni-heidelberg.de
Bradley A Warady
Children's Mercy Hospital · USUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peritoneal dialysis is the preferred chronic dialysis modality for most children owing to its almost universal applicability and superior compatibility with lifestyle over other modalities. Although technological advances and increasing clinical experience have impacted favorably on patient and technique survival, clinical research in pediatric peritoneal dialysis has been hampered by the low incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the pediatric population. To overcome this limitation, several international registries have emerged in the past few years to complement other long-standing registries, which together have provided useful information regarding technique-specific complications and comorbidities associated with ESRD in children undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysis. In this Review, we summarize the most relevant findings from these studies, highlighting the substantial variation in patient conditions, peritoneal dialysis practices and management of comorbidities encountered in different parts of the world.

Indexed as

ChildComorbidityHumansIncidenceKidney Failure, ChronicPeritoneal DialysisPrevalenceRegistriesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID21947118
OpenAlexW2086035477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.