Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21946663›Full record

ReviewImmunology and cell biology2012

Prostaglandin E2 and T cells: friends or foes?

Vinatha Sreeramkumar, Manuel Fresno, Natalia Cuesta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunology and cell biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Dissecting PGENature communications · 2026
    Article
  6. Ablation of prostaglandin ENature biomedical engineering · 2026
    Article
  7. Mast cell driven immunometabolism as a therapeutic entry point in ESCC.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Integrating Metabolic Modulation and Nanomedicine for Cancer Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Blocking MIF secretion enhances CAR T-cell efficacy against neuroblastoma.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. PGENature · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Stem cells and pain.World journal of stem cells · 2023
    Review
  20. Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vinatha SreeramkumarDepartment of Molecular Biology, Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa, UAM-CSIC, Madrid, Spain. vinatha56@gmail.com
Manuel Fresno
Natalia Cuesta

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our understanding of the key players involved in the differential regulation of T-cell responses during inflammation, infection and auto-immunity is fundamental for designing efficient therapeutic strategies against immune diseases. With respect to this, the inhibitory role of the lipid mediator prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) in T-cell immunity has been documented since the 1970s. Studies that ensued investigating the underlying mechanisms substantiated the suppressive function of micromolar concentrations of PGE(2) in T-cell activation, proliferation, differentiation and migration. However, the past decade has seen a revolution in this perspective, since nanomolar concentrations of PGE(2) have been shown to potentiate Th1 and Th17 responses and aid in T-cell proliferation. The understanding of concentration-specific effects of PGE(2) in other cell types, the development of mice deficient in each subtype of the PGE(2) receptors (EP receptors) and the delineation of signalling pathways mediated by the EP receptors have enhanced our understanding of PGE(2) as an immune-stimulator. PGE(2) regulates a multitude of functions in T-cell activation and differentiation and these effects vary depending on the micro-environment of the cell, maturation and activation state of the cell, type of EP receptor involved, local concentration of PGE(2) and whether it is a homeostatic or inflammatory scenario. In this review, we compartmentalize the various aspects of this complex relationship of PGE(2) with T lymphocytes. Given the importance of this molecule in T-cell activation, we also address the possibility of using EP receptor antagonism as a potential therapeutic approach for some immune disorders.

Indexed as

Lymphocyte ActivationAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell MovementCell ProliferationDinoprostoneImmune ToleranceInflammationMiceReceptors, Prostaglandin ESignal TransductionT-LymphocytesDinoprostoneReceptors, Prostaglandin E

Identifiers

PMID21946663
PMCPMC3389798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.