Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21946326›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2011

Neural activity at the human olfactory epithelium reflects olfactory perception.

Hadas Lapid, Sagit Shushan, Anton Plotkin, Hillary Voet, Yehudah Roth, Thomas Hummel, Elad Schneidman, Noam Sobel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Odor Thresholds in Flavor Science: A Data-Driven Review From Mechanisms to Applications.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Incidence of Anosmia among Covid 19 patients in India.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022
    Article
  12. International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The role of hedonics in the Human Affectome.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hadas LapidDepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. hadas.lapid@gmail.com
Sagit Shushan
Anton Plotkin
Hillary Voet
Yehudah Roth
Thomas Hummel
Elad Schneidman
Noam Sobel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organization of receptive surfaces reflects primary axes of perception. In vision, retinal coordinates reflect spatial coordinates. In audition, cochlear coordinates reflect tonal coordinates. However, the rules underlying the organization of the olfactory receptive surface are unknown. To test the hypothesis that organization of the olfactory epithelium reflects olfactory perception, we inserted an electrode into the human olfactory epithelium to directly measure odorant-induced evoked responses. We found that pairwise differences in odorant pleasantness predicted pairwise differences in response magnitude; that is, a location that responded maximally to a pleasant odorant was likely to respond strongly to other pleasant odorants, and a location that responded maximally to an unpleasant odorant was likely to respond strongly to other unpleasant odorants. Moreover, the extent of an individual's perceptual span predicted their span in evoked response. This suggests that, similarly to receptor surfaces for vision and audition, organization of the olfactory receptor surface reflects key axes of perception.

Indexed as

AdultAnalysis of VarianceArea Under CurveChemical PhenomenaElectrooculographyFemaleHumansMaleNeuronsOdorantsOlfactory MucosaOlfactory PathwaysOlfactory PerceptionPleasureReaction TimeSmell

Identifiers

PMID21946326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.