Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21945200›Full record

ArticleHearing research2011

Inferior colliculus contributions to phase encoding of stop consonants in an animal model.

Catherine M Warrier, Daniel A Abrams, Trent G Nicol, Nina Kraus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Music enrichment programs improve the neural encoding of speech in at-risk children.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The ability to move to a beat is linked to the consistency of neural responses to sound.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Catherine M WarrierAuditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Roxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Frances Searle Builiding, 2240 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL 60208-3550, USA. cwarrier@northwestern.edu
Daniel A Abrams
Trent G Nicol
Nina Kraus
Northwestern University · US

Funding

NEURAL REPRESENTATION OF ACOUSTIC ELEMENTS OF SPEECHR01DC001510 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI KRAUS, NINA · 1993 to 2006
$3.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC001510NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC01510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human auditory brainstem is known to be exquisitely sensitive to fine-grained spectro-temporal differences between speech sound contrasts, and the ability of the brainstem to discriminate between these contrasts is important for speech perception. Recent work has described a novel method for translating brainstem timing differences in response to speech contrasts into frequency-specific phase differentials. Results from this method have shown that the human brainstem response is surprisingly sensitive to phase differences inherent to the stimuli across a wide extent of the spectrum. Here we use an animal model of the auditory brainstem to examine whether the stimulus-specific phase signatures measured in human brainstem responses represent an epiphenomenon associated with far-field (i.e., scalp-recorded) measurement of neural activity, or alternatively whether these specific activity patterns are also evident in auditory nuclei that contribute to the scalp-recorded response, thereby representing a more fundamental temporal processing phenomenon. Responses in anaesthetized guinea pigs to three minimally-contrasting consonant-vowel stimuli were collected simultaneously from the cortical surface vertex and directly from central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICc), measuring volume conducted neural activity and multiunit, near-field activity, respectively. Guinea pig surface responses were similar to human scalp-recorded responses to identical stimuli in gross morphology as well as phase characteristics. Moreover, surface-recorded potentials shared many phase characteristics with near-field ICc activity. Response phase differences were prominent during formant transition periods, reflecting spectro-temporal differences between syllables, and showed more subtle differences during the identical steady state periods. ICc encoded stimulus distinctions over a broader frequency range, with differences apparent in the highest frequency ranges analyzed, up to 3000 Hz. Based on the similarity of phase encoding across sites, and the consistency and sensitivity of response phase measured within ICc, results suggest that a general property of the auditory system is a high degree of sensitivity to fine-grained phase information inherent to complex acoustical stimuli. Furthermore, results suggest that temporal encoding in ICc contributes to temporal features measured in speech-evoked scalp-recorded responses.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemSpeech AcousticsSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAudiometryAuditory ThresholdElectroencephalographyFemaleGuinea PigsHumansInferior ColliculiMaleModels, AnimalPattern Recognition, PhysiologicalSound Spectrography

Identifiers

PMID21945200
PMCPMC3235178
OpenAlexW2002617643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.