ReviewGastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America2011
Endoscopic therapy for severe ulcer bleeding.
Review in Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prophylactic transcatheter arterial embolization for high-risk ulcers following endoscopic hemostasis: a meta-analysis.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2021Pooled it
- Endoscopic advances in the management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A review.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2020Review
- Endoscopic Hemostasis for Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: New Frontiers.Clinical endoscopy · 2019Article
- Devices for endoscopic hemostasis of nonvariceal GI bleeding (with videos).VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2019Article
- Role of endoscopy in acute gastrointestinal bleeding in real clinical practice: An evidence-based review.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2019Review
- Upper non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding - review the effectiveness of endoscopic hemostasis methods.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2015Review
- Recent advances on the management of patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Annals of gastroenterology · 2013Review
- State-of-the-art management of acute bleeding peptic ulcer disease.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology AssociationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding secondary to ulcer disease occurs commonly and results in significant patient morbidity and medical expense. After initial resuscitation, carefully performed endoscopy provides an accurate diagnosis of the source of the UGI hemorrhage and can reliably identify those high-risk subgroups that may benefit most from endoscopic hemostasis. Effective endoscopic hemostasis of ulcer bleeding can significantly improve outcomes by reducing rebleeding, transfusion requirement, and need for surgery, as well as reduce the cost of medical care. This article discusses the important aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of bleeding from ulcers, with a focus on endoscopic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.