Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21944166›Full record

ArticleVisual neuroscience2011

Spatial receptive field properties of rat retinal ganglion cells.

Walter F Heine, Christopher L Passaglia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Visual neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Electronic Retinal Prostheses.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Receptive Field Properties of Koniocellular On/Off Neurons in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus of Marmoset Monkeys.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  4. Pathway-Specific Asymmetries between ON and OFF Visual Signals.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  5. Autophosphorylated CaMKII Facilitates Spike Propagation in Rat Optic Nerve.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Retinal cross talk in the mammalian visual system.Journal of neurophysiology · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Walter F HeineDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Christopher L Passaglia
Boston University · US

Funding

TRAINING IN BIOMOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGYT32GM008541 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI FARB, DAVID H · 1997 to 2022
$5.2M
Retinal Physiology in Experimental GlaucomaR01EY016849 · NEI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI PASSAGLIA, CHRISTOPHER L · 2006 to 2009
$949k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016849NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rat is a popular animal model for vision research, yet there is little quantitative information about the physiological properties of the cells that provide its brain with visual input, the retinal ganglion cells. It is not clear whether rats even possess the full complement of ganglion cell types found in other mammals. Since such information is important for evaluating rodent models of visual disease and elucidating the function of homologous and heterologous cells in different animals, we recorded from rat ganglion cells in vivo and systematically measured their spatial receptive field (RF) properties using spot, annulus, and grating patterns. Most of the recorded cells bore likeness to cat X and Y cells, exhibiting brisk responses, center-surround RFs, and linear or nonlinear spatial summation. The others resembled various types of mammalian W cell, including local-edge-detector cells, suppressed-by-contrast cells, and an unusual type with an ON-OFF surround. They generally exhibited sluggish responses, larger RFs, and lower responsiveness. The peak responsivity of brisk-nonlinear (Y-type) cells was around twice that of brisk-linear (X-type) cells and several fold that of sluggish cells. The RF size of brisk-linear and brisk-nonlinear cells was indistinguishable, with average center and surround diameters of 5.6 ± 1.3 and 26.4 ± 11.3 deg, respectively. In contrast, the center diameter of recorded sluggish cells averaged 12.8 ± 7.9 deg. The homogeneous RF size of rat brisk cells is unlike that of cat X and Y cells, and its implication regarding the putative roles of these two ganglion cell types in visual signaling is discussed.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsMaleNormal DistributionPhotic StimulationRatsRats, Long-EvansRetinaRetinal Ganglion CellsSensory ThresholdsVisual FieldsVisual Pathways

Identifiers

PMID21944166
PMCPMC5130229
OpenAlexW2116980117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.