ArticleBMC cancer2011
Clinical pharmacogenomic testing of KRAS, BRAF and EGFR mutations by high resolution melting analysis and ultra-deep pyrosequencing.
Article in BMC cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution melting curve analysis for discrimination of oncology-associatedThe Journal of international medical research · 2025Pooled it
- High-resolution melting analysis for accurate detection of BRAF mutations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2014Pooled it
- EGFR mutation testing on cytological and histological samples in non-small cell lung cancer: a Polish, single institution study and systematic review of European incidence.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2013Pooled it
- ERKed by too much signaling: from oncogenic driver to therapeutic vulnerability.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Review
- Germline EGFR mutations in lung cancer (Review).Oncology letters · 2023Review
- Low level of stromal lectin-like oxidized LDL receptor 1 and CD8Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2021Observational
- High frequency of microsatellite instability and its substantial co-existence withOncology letters · 2021Article
- Somatic mutation detection efficiency in EGFR: a comparison between high resolution melting analysis and Sanger sequencing.BMC cancer · 2020Article
- SLAM-MS: Mutation scanning of stem-loop amplicons with TaqMan probes by quantitative DNA melting analysis.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Comparison of next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry analysis for targeted therapy-related genomic status in lung cancer patients.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Article
- High-resolution melting for detectingBiomedical reports · 2019Article
- Characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) P848L, an unusual EGFR variant present in lung cancer patients, in a murine Ba/F3 model.FEBS open bio · 2019Article
- Main Risk Factors Association with Proto-Oncogene Mutations in Colorectal CancerAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2018Article
- Clinicopathological Associations of K-RAS and N-RAS Mutations in Indonesian Colorectal Cancer Cohort.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2018Article
- UncommonLung Cancer (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2018Article
- What makes oncogenes mutually exclusive?Small GTPases · 2017Review
- A novelClinical case reports · 2017Article
- Current companion diagnostics in advanced colorectal cancer; getting a bigger and better piece of the pie.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2017Review
- Sensitive High-Resolution Melting Analysis for Screening of KRAS and BRAF Mutations in Iranian Human Metastatic Colorectal CancersAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2016Article
- Challenges of development and implementation of point of care pharmacogenetic testing.Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEpidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and its downstream factors KRAS and BRAF are mutated in several types of cancer, affecting the clinical response to EGFR inhibitors. Mutations in the EGFR kinase domain predict sensitivity to the tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib in lung adenocarcinoma, while activating point mutations in KRAS and BRAF confer resistance to the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab in colorectal cancer. The development of new generation methods for systematic mutation screening of these genes will allow more appropriate therapeutic choices.
methodsWe describe a high resolution melting (HRM) assay for mutation detection in EGFR exons 19-21, KRAS codon 12/13 and BRAF V600 using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. Somatic variation of KRAS exon 2 was also analysed by massively parallel pyrosequencing of amplicons with the GS Junior 454 platform.
resultsWe tested 120 routine diagnostic specimens from patients with colorectal or lung cancer. Mutations in KRAS, BRAF and EGFR were observed in 41.9%, 13.0% and 11.1% of the overall samples, respectively, being mutually exclusive. For KRAS, six types of substitutions were detected (17 G12D, 9 G13D, 7 G12C, 2 G12A, 2 G12V, 2 G12S), while V600E accounted for all the BRAF activating mutations. Regarding EGFR, two cases showed exon 19 deletions (delE746-A750 and delE746-T751insA) and another two substitutions in exon 21 (one showed L858R with the resistance mutation T590M in exon 20, and the other had P848L mutation). Consistent with earlier reports, our results show that KRAS and BRAF mutation frequencies in colorectal cancer were 44.3% and 13.0%, respectively, while EGFR mutations were detected in 11.1% of the lung cancer specimens. Ultra-deep amplicon pyrosequencing successfully validated the HRM results and allowed detection and quantitation of KRAS somatic mutations.
conclusionsHRM is a rapid and sensitive method for moderate-throughput cost-effective screening of oncogene mutations in clinical samples. Rather than Sanger sequence validation, next-generation sequencing technology results in more accurate quantitative results in somatic variation and can be achieved at a higher throughput scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.