Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21943255›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2011

Gender differences in response to cold pressor test assessed with velocity-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance of the coronary sinus.

Pierre-Julien Moro, Antonin Flavian, Alexis Jacquier, Frank Kober, Jacques Quilici, Bénédicte Gaborit, Jean-Louis Bonnet, Guy Moulin, Patrick J Cozzone, Monique Bernard

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Coronary flow reserve evaluated by phase-contrast cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of coronary sinus: a meta-analysis.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Evaluation of ventricular-vascular coupling in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using 2-dimensional speckle tracking imaging.Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban · 2014
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Both Gender and Agonistic Experience Affect Perceived Pain during the Cold Pressor Test.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Influence of Cognitive Orientation and Attentional Focus on Pain Perception.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Reference ranges ("normal values") for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in adults and children: 2020 update.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2020
    Review
  8. Incremental prognostic value of coronary flow reserve determined by phase-contrast cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance of the coronary sinus in patients with diabetes mellitus.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2020
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cold pressor response in high landers versus low landers.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Assessment of global myocardial perfusion reserve using cardiovascular magnetic resonance of coronary sinus flow at 3 Tesla.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2014
    Article
  15. Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2012.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2013
    Review
  16. Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2011.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2012
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Pierre-Julien MoroCentre de Résonance Magnétique Biologique et Médicale, UMR 6612 CNRS, Université de Méditerranée, Faculté de Médecine, 27 Bd Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille cedex 5, France.
Antonin Flavian
Alexis Jacquier
Frank Kober
Jacques Quilici
Bénédicte Gaborit
Jean-Louis Bonnet
Guy Moulin
Patrick J Cozzone
Monique Bernard
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille · FRCentre de Résonance Magnétique Biologique et Médicale · FRHôpital de la Timone · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGender-specific differences in cardiovascular risk are well known, and current evidence supports an existing role of endothelium in these differences. The purpose of this study was to assess non invasively coronary endothelial function in male and female young volunteers by myocardial blood flow (MBF) measurement using coronary sinus (CS) flow quantification by velocity encoded cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) at rest and during cold pressor test (CPT).

methodsTwenty-four healthy volunteers (12 men, 12 women) underwent CMR in a 3 Tesla MR imager. Coronary sinus flow was measured at rest and during CPT using non breath-hold velocity encoded phase contrast cine-CMR. Myocardial function and morphology were acquired using a cine steady-state free precession sequence.

resultsAt baseline, mean MBF was 0.63 ± 0.23 mL·g⁻¹·min⁻¹ in men and 0.79 ± 0.21 mL·g⁻¹·min⁻¹ in women. During CPT, the rate pressure product in men significantly increased by 49 ± 36% (p < 0.0001) and in women by 52 ± 22% (p < 0.0001). MBF increased significantly in both men and women by 0.22 ± 0.19 mL·g⁻¹·min⁻¹ (p = 0.0022) and by 0.73 ± 0.43 mL·g⁻¹·min⁻¹ (p = 0.0001), respectively. The increase in MBF was significantly higher in women than in men (p = 0.0012).

conclusionCMR coronary sinus flow quantification for measuring myocardial blood flow revealed a higher response of MBF to CPT in women than in men. This finding may reflect gender differences in endothelial-dependent vasodilatation in these young subjects. This non invasive rest/stress protocol may become helpful to study endothelial function in normal physiology and in physiopathology.

Indexed as

Cold TemperatureCoronary CirculationMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineAdolescentAdultBlood Flow VelocityBlood PressureCoronary SinusEndothelium, VascularFemaleFranceHandHeart RateHumansImmersionMale

Identifiers

PMID21943255
PMCPMC3189123
OpenAlexW2032117584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.