Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21942978›Full record

ReviewDrugs2011

Fibrin sealant (evicel® [quixil®/crosseal™]): a review of its use as supportive treatment for haemostasis in surgery.

Sohita Dhillon

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Fibrin sealant before wound closure in total knee arthroplasty reduced blood loss: a meta-analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Safety and effectiveness of EvicelChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Sohita DhillonAdis, a Wolters Kluwer Business, Auckland, New Zealand. demail@adis.co.nz
Wolters Kluwer Health · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evicel® is a fibrin sealant consisting of two components, human clottable protein (predominantly human fibrinogen) and human thrombin. It is indicated as supportive treatment in patients undergoing surgery when control of bleeding by standard surgical techniques is ineffective or impractical. Evicel® is a new formulation of the previously available fibrin sealant Quixil® (in the EU) or Crosseal™ (in the US). Evicel® differs from Quixil®/Crosseal™ in that its fibrinogen component does not contain the antifibrinolytic agent tranexamic acid, which is potentially neurotoxic, resulting in Quixil®/Crosseal™ being contraindicated for use in neurosurgery. The removal of tranexamic acid did not affect the haemostatic efficacy or longevity of Evicel® fibrin clots and allowed the sealant to be granted an expanded indication. Evicel® and Quixil®/Crosseal™ are easy to use and, since they do not contain synthetic or bovine aprotinin, have a reduced potential for hypersensitivity reactions. This article reviews the pharmacological properties, clinical efficacy and tolerability of Evicel® and its previous formulation as supportive treatment for haemostasis in surgery. In clinical studies, Evicel® and Quixil®/Crosseal™ were generally well tolerated and effective haemostatic agents for adjunctive use in various types of surgeries when conventional methods were impractical or ineffective in controlling bleeding. Two pivotal, randomized studies showed that Evicel® was significantly more effective than manual compression in patients undergoing vascular surgery, and significantly more effective than Surgicel® in patients undergoing retroperitoneal or intra-abdominal surgery, as assessed by the proportion of patients achieving haemostasis. In another similarly designed pivotal study in patients undergoing liver resection, Crosseal™ was significantly more effective than standard haemostatic agents (e.g. Surgicel®), as assessed by the mean time to haemostasis. The incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events in these studies were generally similar between the Evicel® or Crosseal™ groups and the comparator groups. Quixil® was also generally well tolerated and an effective haemostatic agent in endonasal surgeries, and tonsillectomies and/or adenoidectomies, with some benefit of treatment with Evicel® or Quixil® also observed in orthopaedic surgeries. Although additional comparative studies with other haemostatic agents would help to definitively position Evicel® with respect to these agents, current evidence suggests that Evicel® is useful in surgeries for improving haemostasis where standard surgical techniques are insufficient.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood Loss, SurgicalClinical Trials as TopicFibrin Tissue AdhesiveHemostasis, SurgicalHemostaticsHumansFibrin Tissue AdhesiveHemostatics

Identifiers

PMID21942978
OpenAlexW126985066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.