ReviewDrugs2011
Biomarkers of therapeutic response in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a critical review of the literature.
Review in Drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- The role of extracellular vesicles in COPD and potential clinical value.Respiratory research · 2024Review
- MCP-4 and Eotaxin-3 Are Novel Biomarkers for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Canadian respiratory journal · 2023Article
- Serum levels of IGFBP7 are elevated during acute exacerbation in COPD patients.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2017Article
- Article
- The matrikine PGP as a potential biomarker in COPD.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2015Review
- Biomarkers in airway diseases.Canadian respiratory journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality across the world. Unfortunately, none of the current therapies, except for smoking cessation and supplemental domiciliary oxygen for hypoxaemic patients, can modify its natural course or alter survival. The pipeline for new compounds is not very promising owing to repeated failures, and many large pharmaceutical companies have abandoned COPD drug discovery altogether. One major barrier to new drug discovery is the lack of modifiable biomarkers that can be used as surrogates of clinical outcomes such as exacerbation and mortality. The only accepted marker in COPD is forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)). However, by definition, COPD is a non-reversible or poorly reversible condition with respect to FEV(1). Thus, very few drugs except for bronchodilators have been able to address this endpoint. Of many candidate molecules, sputum neutrophil counts, exhaled corrected alveolar nitric oxide and proline-glycine-proline (PGP) and N-α-PGP, which are breakdown products of collagen, are promising lung-based biomarkers. However, their clinical utility has not been validated in large clinical trials. Promising blood biomarkers include surfactant protein D, and pulmonary- and activation-regulated chemokine (PARC/CCL-18). However, the clinical data have been inconsistent. Non-specific inflammatory biomarkers such as C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 lack specificity for COPD and thus are of limited clinical usefulness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.