ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2011
Comparative effects of different test day challenges on performance in the 5-choice serial reaction time task.
Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distinct neuronal processes in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex mediate changes in attention load and nicotine pro-cognitive effects in male rats.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2025Article
- Article
- Attentional processing in the rat dorsal posterior parietal cortex.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2024Article
- Knowledge by omission: the significance of omissions in the 5-choice serial reaction time task.Psychopharmacology · 2024Article
- Longitudinal assessment of cognitive function in the APPswe/PS1dE9 mouse model of Alzheimer's-related beta-amyloidosis.Neurobiology of aging · 2023Article
- Assessing attention and impulsivity in the variable stimulus duration and variable intertrial interval rodent continuous performance test schedules using noradrenaline receptor antagonists in female C57BL/6JRj mice.Psychopharmacology · 2023Article
- Assessing attention and impulsivity in the variable stimulus duration and variable intertrial interval rodent continuous performance test schedules using dopamine receptor antagonists in female C57BL/6JRj mice.Psychopharmacology · 2023Article
- Effects of ketamine optical isomers, psilocybin, psilocin and norpsilocin on time estimation and cognition in rats.Psychopharmacology · 2022Article
- Interactions between impulsivity and MDPV self-administration in rats.Addiction biology · 2022Article
- Cognitive performance during adulthood in a rat model of neonatal diffuse white matter injury.Psychopharmacology · 2022Article
- Contribution of GABABehavioural brain research · 2020Article
- Characterization of Amphetamine, Methylphenidate, Nicotine, and Atomoxetine on Measures of Attention, Impulsive Action, and Motivation in the Rat: Implications for Translational Research.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
- Neonatal 6-OHDA Lesion Model in Mouse Induces Cognitive Dysfunctions of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) During Young Age.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2020Article
- The Claustrum-Prefrontal Cortex Pathway Regulates Impulsive-Like Behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Article
- Atomoxetine improves memory and other components of executive function in young-adult rats and aged rhesus monkeys.Neuropharmacology · 2019Article
- Effect of early maternal separation stress on attention, spatial learning and social interaction behaviour.Experimental brain research · 2019Article
- Incisional Nociceptive Input Impairs Attention-related Behavior and Is Associated with Reduced Neuronal Activity in the Prefrontal Cortex in Rats.Anesthesiology · 2018Article
- Attentional Control in Adolescent Mice Assessed with a Modified Five Choice Serial Reaction Time Task.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Thalamic inputs to dorsomedial striatum are involved in inhibitory control: evidence from the five-choice serial reaction time task in rats.Psychopharmacology · 2017Article
- A schizophrenia relevant 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task for mice assessing broad monitoring, distractibility and impulsivity.Psychopharmacology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The 5-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT) is a valuable cognitive test that permits the simultaneous assessment of several different cognitive modalities, including attention, impulse control, processing speed, and cognitive flexibility. Increasing task difficulty on test days through various challenges can further enhance the versatility of this test by selectively enhancing the cognitive load on different aspects of the task. Systematic comparisons of the effects of different test day challenges on 5-CSRTT performance are essential to verify how these challenges affect different task measures and which manipulations are best suited for future studies of different aspects of cognition. We trained Wistar rats in the 5-CSRTT under standard conditions, then challenged them on the test days by (1) decreasing the duration of the stimulus to be detected, (2) increasing the time interval between trials (intertrial interval, ITI), (3) randomly varying the ITI, or (4) adding a flashing light distractor. All test day challenges produced distinct profiles of performance disruption that reflected differential effects on different cognitive modalities. Decreased stimulus duration selectively impaired attentional performance, while increased ITI increased impulsive-like premature responses and decreased trials completed. Variable ITI induced only mild, nonsignificant disruptions in response inhibition and processing speed, while the flashing light distractor produced comprehensive impairment affecting multiple aspects of 5-CSRTT performance, including disrupted attention and increased premature and timeout responses. This improved understanding of the effects of different test day challenges in the 5-CSRTT will allow researchers to use these manipulations of a valuable cognitive test to their full potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.