Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21942424›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of medicine2012

New paradigms for HIV/AIDS vaccine development.

Louis J Picker, Scott G Hansen, Jeffrey D Lifson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. mRNA-based HIV-1 vaccines.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  11. CD8Science advances · 2024
    Article
  12. Functional genomic analysis of the 68-1 RhCMV-Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  13. Recent advances in CD8Heliyon · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Louis J PickerVaccine and Gene Therapy Institute, Department of Molecular Microbiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, Oregon 97006, USA. pickerl@ohsu.edu
Scott G Hansen
Jeffrey D Lifson

Funding

YR 50 PROJ- ROBERTS PRIMATE ISLETP51RR000163 · NCRR · OREGON REGIONAL PRIMATE RESEARCH CENTER · PI FRUH, KLAUS J · 1985 to 2011
$140.8M
Role of Memory T Cell Dynamics in SIV InfectionR37AI054292 · NIAID · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI PICKER, LOUIS J. · 2008 to 2017
$9.8M
Efficacy of Oral CMV/SIV VectorsR01DE021291 · NIDCR · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI PICKER, LOUIS J. · 2011 to 2015
$4.6M
Development and In Vivo Characterization of Safety-Enhanced RhCMV/SIV VectorsR01AI095113 · NIAID · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI PICKER, LOUIS J. · 2011 to 2015
$4.1M
Development of RhCMV Vectors for SIV InfectionR01AI060392 · NIAID · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI PICKER, LOUIS J. · 2004 to 2009
$3.7M
Development of RhCMV Vectors for SIV InfectionR56AI060392 · NIAID · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI PICKER, LOUIS J. · 2010 to 2010
$500k
REPRODUCTIVE STEROIDS AND EXPERIMENTAL STROKEK01RR000163 · NCRR · OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI MURPHY, STEPHANIE J · 2000 to 2004
$479k
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001ENCRR NIH HHS K01 RR000163NCRR NIH HHS P51 RR000163NCRR NIH HHS RR00163NIAID NIH HHS AI060392NIAID NIH HHS AI095113NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI060392NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI095113NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI054292NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI060392NIDCR NIH HHS DE02129NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE021291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HIV-1 and its simian counterpart SIV have been exquisitely tailored by evolution to evade host immunity. By virtue of specific adaptations that thwart individual innate or adaptive immune mechanisms, and an overall replication strategy that provides for rapid establishment of a large, systemic viral population, capable of dynamic adaptation to almost all immune selection pressures, these viruses, once established, almost invariably stay one step ahead of the host's immune system, and in the vast majority of infected individuals, replicate indefinitely. Although many vaccine approaches tested to date have been able to enhance the magnitude of the immune responses to HIV/SIV infection, most of these responses, whether cellular or humoral, have largely failed to be both effectively antiviral and targeted to prevent the emergence of fully functional escape variants. Recent advances, however, have provided strong evidence that the initial stages of infection following mucosal transmission of these viruses are more vulnerable to immune intervention, and have led to the development of vaccine strategies that elicit responses able to effectively intervene in these early stages of infection, either preventing acquisition of infection or establishing early, stringent, and durable control. Here, we place HIV/AIDS vaccine development in the context of the basic immunobiology of HIV and SIV, review the evidence for their vulnerability to immune responses immediately after mucosal transmission, and discuss how this newly recognized vulnerability might be exploited for the development of an effective HIV/AIDS vaccine.

Indexed as

Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAIDS VaccinesAllergy and ImmunologyHumansAIDS Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID21942424
PMCPMC3368276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.