ReviewCurrent opinion in nephrology and hypertension2011
Predictive modeling for improved anemia management in dialysis patients.
Review in Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Haemoglobin variability and all-cause mortality in haemodialysis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2019Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Patient Blood Management: A Systematic Review of Predictive, Diagnostic, and Decision Support Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Optimal EPO dosing in hemodialysis patients using a non-linear model predictive control approach.Journal of mathematical biology · 2019Article
- Individualized anemia management in a dialysis facility - long-term utility as a single-center quality improvement experience .Clinical nephrology · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review will explore the basic assumptions needed to perform predictive modeling of hemoglobin response to erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) and summarize the current literature in the area so that the practitioner can incorporate these tools as part of an improved anemia management process. RECENT
findingsDuring the last year, several publications have demonstrated some advances in the field that may improve anemia management. The first of these was the publication of a randomized, controlled clinical trial of model predictive control in the dosing of erythropoietin. This work showed that hemoglobin variability can be decreased using predictive models of hemoglobin response. The second publication is potentially more interesting in the long run, as new markers of erythropoietin response were identified in a well-defined population of patients. SUMMARY: Predictive models of hemoglobin response improve anemia management by decreasing hemoglobin variability. This will result in more patients within the target range. Coupling these tools with new biomarkers of hemoglobin response has the potential to dramatically improve anemia management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.