Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21940915›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2011

Future infectious disease threats to Europe.

Jonathan E Suk, Jan C Semenza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Permafrost Immunity.Bioinformation · 2022
    Article
  8. How the gut parasitome affects human health.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Antimicrobial resistance inSexually transmitted infections · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Emerging Mosquito-Borne Threats and the Response from European and Eastern Mediterranean Countries.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observed and projected drivers of emerging infectious diseases in Europe.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jonathan E SukEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jan C Semenza

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined how different drivers of infectious disease could interact to threaten control efforts in Europe. We considered projected trends through 2020 for 3 broad groups of drivers: globalization and environmental change, social and demographic change, and health system capacity. Eight plausible infectious disease threats with the potential to be significantly more problematic than they are today were identified through an expert consultation: extensively drug-resistant bacteria, vector-borne diseases, sexually transmitted infections, food-borne infections, a resurgence of vaccine-preventable diseases, health care-associated infections, multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, and pandemic influenza. Preemptive measures to be taken by the public health community to counteract these threats were identified.

Indexed as

Global HealthPublic Health AdministrationAnimalsCommunicable Disease ControlCommunicable DiseasesCross InfectionDisaster PlanningDisease VectorsDrug Resistance, BacterialEpidemicsEuropeHumansInfluenza, HumanPopulation DynamicsSocioeconomic FactorsTuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant

Identifiers

PMID21940915
PMCPMC3222407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.