Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21940430›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2011

Complementary function and integrated wiring of the evolutionarily distinct Drosophila olfactory subsystems.

Ana F Silbering, Raphael Rytz, Yael Grosjean, Liliane Abuin, Pavan Ramdya, Gregory S X E Jefferis, Richard Benton

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 284 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
284citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

284 citing papers in PubMed, 517 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Noses on the wing: the olfactory capacity of hawkmoth wings.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The Sensory Basis of Planarian Behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  8. Receptor sequence divergence, gain, loss, duplication, and neofunctionalization drive olfactory adaptation inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Insects · 2026
    Article
  12. Hawkmoths can smell with grooming organs on their legs.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

224 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Ana F SilberingCenter for Integrative Genomics, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Raphael Rytz
Yael Grosjean
Liliane Abuin
Pavan Ramdya
Gregory S X E Jefferis
Richard Benton
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHInstitute of Neurobiology · BGUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105188491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To sense myriad environmental odors, animals have evolved multiple, large families of divergent olfactory receptors. How and why distinct receptor repertoires and their associated circuits are functionally and anatomically integrated is essentially unknown. We have addressed these questions through comprehensive comparative analysis of the Drosophila olfactory subsystems that express the ionotropic receptors (IRs) and odorant receptors (ORs). We identify ligands for most IR neuron classes, revealing their specificity for select amines and acids, which complements the broader tuning of ORs for esters and alcohols. IR and OR sensory neurons exhibit glomerular convergence in segregated, although interconnected, zones of the primary olfactory center, but these circuits are extensively interdigitated in higher brain regions. Consistently, behavioral responses to odors arise from an interplay between IR- and OR-dependent pathways. We integrate knowledge on the different phylogenetic and developmental properties of these receptors and circuits to propose models for the functional contributions and evolution of these distinct olfactory subsystems.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBiological EvolutionDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsLigandsMaze LearningMutationOdorantsOlfactory PathwaysOlfactory PerceptionOlfactory Receptor NeuronsReceptors, Ionotropic GlutamateReceptors, OdorantDrosophila Proteinsionotropic receptor 25a, Drosophilaionotropic receptor 8a, DrosophilaLigandsReceptors, Ionotropic GlutamateReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID21940430
PMCPMC6623294
OpenAlexW1979639373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.