Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21939387›Full record

ArticleAntioxidants & redox signaling2012

Systemic redox regulation of cellular information processing.

Gaurav Dwivedi, Melissa L Kemp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antioxidants & redox signaling, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Can thiol-based redox systems be utilized as parts for synthetic biology applications?Redox report : communications in free radical research · 2021
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Single-cell resolution of intracellular T cell CaIntegrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2017
    Article
  4. Dynamic Redox Regulation of IL-4 Signaling.PLoS computational biology · 2015
    Article
  5. Elements of the cellular metabolic structure.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2015
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gaurav DwivediThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Melissa L Kemp
The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering · US

Funding

Redox regulation of cellular information processingDP2OD006483 · OD · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KEMP, MELISSA LAMBETH · 2009 to 2009
$2.3M
NIH HHS 1DP2OD006483-01NIH HHS DP2 OD006483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Receptor-mediated signaling leads to transient changes in redox state, resulting in reversible oxidation of protein cysteine thiols. Numerous signaling proteins have been identified as being redox sensitive; however, to date, most investigations have focused on the ramifications of isolated protein modifications on cellular phenotypes. We propose that reversible thiol oxidation of proteins in a signaling network and their systemic interactions introduce features in the dynamics and control of cellular responses that are unique compared with isolated oxidative protein modifications. Simulations of dynamic redox regulation in different cellular contexts reveal feasible regulatory features for future experimental investigation. We suggest that location within a network, compartmentalization, and the degree of connectivity between redox proteins can dramatically modulate cellular information processing.

Indexed as

Cell Physiological PhenomenaComputational BiologyModels, BiologicalOxidation-ReductionProteinsSignal TransductionSulfhydryl CompoundsProteinsSulfhydryl Compounds

Identifiers

PMID21939387
PMCPMC3279717
OpenAlexW1963822410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.