Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21937882›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics2011

Limiting dilution bisulfite (pyro)sequencing reveals parent-specific methylation patterns in single early mouse embryos and bovine oocytes.

Nady El Hajj, Tom Trapphoff, Matthias Linke, Andreas May, Tamara Hansmann, Juliane Kuhtz, Kurt Reifenberg, Julia Heinzmann, Heiner Niemann, Angelika Daser and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. DNA methylation analysis and editing in single mammalian oocytes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  7. Maintenance ofEnvironmental epigenetics · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Single oocyte bisulfite mutagenesis.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nady El HajjInstitute of Human Genetics, Julius Maximilians University, Biozentrum, Am Hubland, Würzburg, Germany.
Tom Trapphoff
Matthias Linke
Andreas May
Tamara Hansmann
Juliane Kuhtz
Kurt Reifenberg
Julia Heinzmann
Heiner Niemann
Angelika Daser
Ursula Eichenlaub-Ritter
Ulrich Zechner
Thomas Haaf
University of Würzburg · DEUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEBielefeld University · DEFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To detect rare epigenetic effects associated with assisted reproduction, it is necessary to monitor methylation patterns of developmentally important genes in a few germ cells and individual embryos. Bisulfite treatment degrades DNA and reduces its complexity, rendering methylation analysis from small amounts of DNA extremely challenging. Here we describe a simple approach that allows determining the parent-specific methylation patterns of multiple genes in individual early embryos. Limiting dilution (LD) of bisulfite-treated DNA is combined with independent multiplex PCRs of single DNA target molecules to avoid amplification bias. Using this approach, we compared the methylation status of three imprinted (H19, Snrpn and Igf2r) and one pluripotency-related gene (Oct4) in three different groups of single mouse two-cell embryos. Standard in vitro fertilization of superovulated oocytes and the use of in vitro matured oocytes were not associated with significantly increased rates of stochastic single CpG methylation errors and epimutations (allele methylation errors), when compared with the in vivo produced controls. Similarly, we compared the methylation patterns of two imprinted genes (H19 and Snrpn) in individual mouse 16-cell embryos produced in vivo from superovulated and non-superovulated oocytes and did not observe major between-group differences. Using bovine oocytes and polar bodies as a model, we demonstrate that LD even allows the methylation analysis of multiple genes in single cells.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticAnimalsCattleEmbryo, MammalianGenomic ImprintingMiceOocytesPolar BodiesReproductive Techniques, AssistedSequence Analysis, DNASulfiteshydrogen sulfiteSulfites

Identifiers

PMID21937882
PMCPMC3225839
OpenAlexW2001375440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.