ArticleBMC cancer2011
An investigation of the apparent breast cancer epidemic in France: screening and incidence trends in birth cohorts.
Article in BMC cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Quantifying and monitoring overdiagnosis in cancer screening: a systematic review of methods.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2015Pooled it
- Is there excess mortality in women screened with mammography: a meta-analysis of non-breast cancer mortality.Trials · 2013Pooled it
- Guideline sheets on the side effects of anticancer drugs are useful for general practitioners.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2015Trial
- Incidence of other cancer diagnoses in women with breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study with 42,248 women.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2022Article
- Breast Cancer Incidence Trends in Isfahan Province Compared with those in England over the Period 2001-2013.International journal of preventive medicine · 2021Article
- The Advent of Salivary Breast Cancer Biomarker Detection Using Affinity Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Is there a genetic anticipation in breast and/or ovarian cancer families with the germline c.3481_3491del11 mutation?Familial cancer · 2018Article
- A qualitative study of women's views on overdiagnosis and screening for thyroid cancer in Korea.BMC cancer · 2015Article
- Overdiagnosis: epidemiologic concepts and estimation.Epidemiology and health · 2015Article
- Immediate and delayed effects of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality and incidence in birth cohorts.British journal of cancer · 2013Article
- Incidence of breast cancer and estimates of overdiagnosis after the initiation of a population-based mammography screening program.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2013Article
- The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.British journal of cancer · 2013Review
- Women's views on overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: a qualitative study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOfficial descriptive data from France showed a strong increase in breast-cancer incidence between 1980 to 2005 without a corresponding change in breast-cancer mortality. This study quantifies the part of incidence increase due to secular changes in risk factor exposure and in overdiagnosis due to organised or opportunistic screening. Overdiagnosis was defined as non progressive tumours diagnosed as cancer at histology or progressive cancer that would remain asymptomatic until time of death for another cause.
methodsComparison between age-matched cohorts from 1980 to 2005. All women residing in France and born 1911-1915, 1926-1930 and 1941-1945 are included. Sources are official data sets and published French reports on screening by mammography, age and time specific breast-cancer incidence and mortality, hormone replacement therapy, alcohol and obesity. Outcome measures include breast-cancer incidence differences adjusted for changes in risk factor distributions between pairs of age-matched cohorts who had experienced different levels of screening intensity.
resultsThere was an 8-fold increase in the number of mammography machines operating in France between 1980 and 2000. Opportunistic and organised screening increased over time. In comparison to age-matched cohorts born 15 years earlier, recent cohorts had adjusted incidence proportion over 11 years that were 76% higher [95% confidence limits (CL) 67%, 85%] for women aged 50 to 64 years and 23% higher [95% CL 15%, 31%] for women aged 65 to 79 years. Given that mortality did not change correspondingly, this increase in adjusted 11 year incidence proportion was considered as an estimate of overdiagnosis.
conclusionsBreast cancer may be overdiagnosed because screening increases diagnosis of slowly progressing non-life threatening cancer and increases misdiagnosis among women without progressive cancer. We suggest that these effects could largely explain the reported "epidemic" of breast cancer in France. Better predictive classification of tumours is needed in order to avoid unnecessary cancer diagnoses and subsequent procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.