Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21936589›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2011

Retigabine (ezogabine): in partial-onset seizures in adults with epilepsy.

Emma D Deeks

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emma D DeeksAdis, a Wolters Kluwer Business, Auckland, New Zealand.
Wolters Kluwer Health · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retigabine (ezogabine in the US) opens neuronal voltage-gated potassium channels, resulting in resting membrane potential stabilization, neuronal subthreshold excitability control and anticonvulsant effects. The clinical efficacy of adjunctive oral retigabine in adults with inadequately controlled, partial-onset seizures was demonstrated in two large, well designed, phase III trials (RESTORE-1 and RESTORE-2), generally confirming the findings of an earlier phase IIb study. In the RESTORE trials, retigabine 600, 900 or 1200 mg/day was associated with significantly higher rates of response (i.e. reduction in 28-day total partial seizure frequency of ≥50%) than placebo during both the 12-week maintenance period and the entire 16- or 18-week double-blind phase (i.e. titration plus maintenance) of the studies. Retigabine recipients also had significantly greater median reductions from baseline in 28-day total partial seizure frequency than placebo recipients during these treatment periods. These benefits of retigabine were generally seen irrespective of age, gender, race and baseline seizure frequency, and were maintained for up to 12 months according to interim data from subsequent open-label extension studies, with some patients also experiencing seizure-free periods of up to 12 months. Retigabine was generally well tolerated in adults with partial-onset seizures in the RESTORE studies, with most adverse events being of mild or moderate severity.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsCarbamatesClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicEpilepsyHumansPhenylenediaminesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSeizuresAnticonvulsantsCarbamatesezogabinePhenylenediamines

Identifiers

PMID21936589
OpenAlexW2313439458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.