Trial reportClinical neuroradiology2012
Stent angioplasty of intracranial stenosis: single center experience of 54 cases.
Trial report in Clinical neuroradiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drug-eluting stent versus bare metal stent for symptomatic intracranial stenosis: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis study.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Balloon-mounting stent for intracranial arterial stenosis: A comprehensive and comparative systematic review and meta-analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023Pooled it
- Endovascular Therapy for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.Translational stroke research · 2022Pooled it
- Potential for the use of the Solitaire stent for recanalization of middle cerebral artery occlusion without a susceptibility vessel sign.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2014Trial
- Endovascular Management of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: Lessons from Mistakes in the Past and how to Achieve Improved Outcomes.Clinical neuroradiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of the study was to retrospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of stent angioplasty of symptomatic intracranial stenosis in a single center experience. MATERIALS AND
methodsBetween November 2006 and September 2009 a total of 54 stent angioplasties were performed in 49 patients and of these 46 were done for symptomatic intracranial high-grade (>70%) stenoses and 8 for complete vessel occlusions in acute stroke. All elective treatments were carried out with patients under antithrombotic/anticoagulant medication. Self-expandable stents were used in 42 cases and balloon-expandable stents in 12 cases.
resultsStent angioplasty was successful in 53 out of 54 cases (98%). Periprocedural complications occurred in 6 patients, including 2 dissections, 1 contrast-mediated toxic reaction and 1 thromboembolic event with transient neurological deficits but did not cause permanent neurological deficits, in any of the cases. Adverse events within 30 days after intervention occurred in 11 of the 49 patients (20.4%) of which 4 were scheduled patients (8.3%) and 7 were treated for acute stroke with complete vessel occlusions (87.5%). Overall there were 9 cases of restenosis (7 out of 9>90% stenoses and 2 complete vessel occlusions), 5 out of 9 were asymptomatic, 4 out of 9 had a transient ischemic attack and 1 developed a major stroke. Two complete in-stent thromboses were seen in acute stroke patients with initial complete occlusion within 24 h after recanalization. One restenosis and one complete occlusion occurred under double antiplatelet medication, 4 out of 9 restenoses occurred under aspisol medication and 3 out of 9 after antiplatelet medication was discontinued. In 2 out of 9 restenoses, balloon-expandable stents had been used, the remaining 7 had been treated with self-expanding stents, 5 out of 9 restenoses were treated by balloon-angioplasty alone, in 3 out of 9 an additional stent had to be placed and 1 asymptomatic occlusion was left untreated.
conclusionsThe results demonstrate the technical feasibility and satisfactory success rates of stent angioplasty in intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses. The procedural success rate was 98% and the overall rate of adverse events was 20.4%. The rate of adverse events was high in unstable patients (87.5%) treated without antiplatelet premedication, especially in the setting of an acute stroke. In stable patients the rate of adverse events was much lower (8.3%). Future development of dedicated stents and a better understanding of factors that predispose to restenosis may help to further decrease the rate of periprocedural and postprocedural adverse events thus helping to improve both short-term and long-term outcome after intracranial stent angioplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.