Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21935490›Full record

ArticleThe Korean journal of pain2011

Participation of K(ATP) Channels in the Antinociceptive Effect of Pregabalin in Rat Formalin Test.

Tae Dong Kweon, Ji Young Kim, Il Won Kwon, Jong Bum Choi, Youn Woo Lee

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Korean journal of pain, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tae Dong KweonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ji Young Kim
Il Won Kwon
Jong Bum Choi
Youn Woo Lee
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregabalin is an anticonvulsant and analgesic agent that interacts selectively with the voltage-sensitive-Ca(2+)-channel alpha-2-delta subunit. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the analgesic action of intrathecal (IT) pregabalin is associated with K(ATP) channels in the rat formalin test.

methodsIT PE-10 catheters were implanted in male Sprague-Dawley rats (250-300 g) under inhalation anesthesia using enflurane. Nociceptive behavior was defined as the number of hind paw flinches during 60 min after formalin injection. Ten min before formalin injection, IT drug treatments were divided into 3 groups: normal saline (NS) 20 µl (CON group); pregabalin 0.3, 1, 3 and 10 µg in NS 10 µl (PGB group); glibenclamide 100 µg in DMSO 5 µl with pregabalin 0.3, 1, 3 and 10 µg in NS 5 µl (GBC group). All the drugs were flushed with NS 10 µl. Immunohistochemistry for the K(ATP) channel was done with a different set of rats divided into naïve, NS and PGB groups.

resultsIT pregabalin dose-dependently decreased the flinching number only in phase 2 of formalin test. The log dose response curve of the GBC group shifted to the right with respect to that of the PGB group. Immunohistochemistry for the K(ATP) channel expression on the spinal cord dorsal horn showed no difference among the groups 1 hr after the formalin test.

conclusionsThe antinociceptive effect of pregabalin in the rat formalin test was associated with the activation of the K(ATP) channel. However, pregabalin did not induce K(ATP) channel expression in the spinal cord dorsal horn.

Indexed as

antinociceptionformalin testKATP channelpregabalin

Identifiers

PMID21935490
PMCPMC3172325
OpenAlexW2136666652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.