Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21934455›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2011

Obstetrician-gynecologists' objections to and willingness to help patients obtain an abortion.

Lisa H Harris, Alexandra Cooper, Kenneth A Rasinski, Farr A Curlin, Anne Drapkin Lyerly

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Professionalism in Family Planning Care Workshop.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Factors Shaping Women's Pre-abortion Communication with Their Regular Gynecologic Care Providers.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lisa H HarrisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. lhharris@med.umich.edu
Alexandra Cooper
Kenneth A Rasinski
Farr A Curlin
Anne Drapkin Lyerly

Funding

Ethical Issues Regarding Women in Health ResearchK01HL072437 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LYERLY, ANNE DRAPKIN · 2005 to 2009
$513k
NHLBI NIH HHS 5 K01 HL072437-05NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL072437
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe obstetrician-gynecologists' (ob-gyns') views and willingness to help women seeking abortion in a variety of clinical scenarios.

methodsWe conducted a mailed survey of 1,800 U.S. ob-gyns. We presented seven scenarios in which patients sought abortions. For each, respondents indicated if they morally objected to abortion and if they would help patients obtain an abortion. We analyzed predictors of objection and assistance.

resultsThe response rate was 66%. Objection to abortion ranged from 16% (cardiopulmonary disease) to 82% (sex selection); willingness to assist ranged from 64% (sex selection) to 93% (cardiopulmonary disease). Excluding sex selection, objection was less likely among ob-gyns who were female (odds ratio [OR] 0.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4-0.8), urban (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.7), or Jewish (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.7) compared with male, rural, or religiously unaffiliated ob-gyns. Objection was more likely among ob-gyns from the South (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.0) or Midwest (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.1), and among Catholic, Evangelical Protestant, or Muslim ob-gyns, or those for whom religion was most important, compared with reference. Among ob-gyns who objected to abortion in a given case, approximately two-thirds would help patients obtain an abortion. Excluding sex selection, assistance despite objection was more likely among female (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-2.9) and United States-born ob-gyns (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.7) and less likely among southern ob-gyns (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.6) or those for whom religion was most important (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.7).

conclusionMost ob-gyns help patients obtain an abortion even when they morally object to abortion in that case. Willingness to assist varies by clinical context and physician characteristics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Indexed as

Abortion ApplicantsAttitude of Health PersonnelAbortion, InducedAdultFemaleGynecologyHealth Care SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedObstetricsPhysiciansPregnancySex FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID21934455
PMCPMC4185126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.