ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2011
Obstetrician-gynecologists' objections to and willingness to help patients obtain an abortion.
Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers and motivations: analyzing the factors influencing abortion provision by gynecologists in Germany - a cross-sectional study.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- How Are Healthcare Providers Conscientiously Objecting to Abortion in Australia? A Qualitative Study.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2026Article
- Article
- Stigma towards women requesting abortion and association with health facility staff facilitation and obstruction of abortion care in South Africa.Frontiers in global women's health · 2023Article
- Survey of knowledge and attitude regarding induced abortion among nurses in a tertiary hospital in Thailand after amendment of the abortion act: a cross-sectional study.BMC women's health · 2022Article
- Willing but unable: Physicians' referral knowledge as barriers to abortion care.SSM - population health · 2022Article
- Professionalism in Family Planning Care Workshop.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2022Article
- Factors influencing practitioners' who do not participate in ethically complex, legally available care: scoping review.BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
- Judicial bypass attorneys' experiences with abortion stigma in Texas courts.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2021Article
- Ethical attitudes of German specialists in reproductive medicine and legal regulation of preimplantation sex selection in Germany.PloS one · 2013Article
- "Prefacing the Script" as an Ethical Response to State-Mandated Abortion Counseling.AJOB empirical bioethicsArticle
- Factors Shaping Women's Pre-abortion Communication with Their Regular Gynecologic Care Providers.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's HealthArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo describe obstetrician-gynecologists' (ob-gyns') views and willingness to help women seeking abortion in a variety of clinical scenarios.
methodsWe conducted a mailed survey of 1,800 U.S. ob-gyns. We presented seven scenarios in which patients sought abortions. For each, respondents indicated if they morally objected to abortion and if they would help patients obtain an abortion. We analyzed predictors of objection and assistance.
resultsThe response rate was 66%. Objection to abortion ranged from 16% (cardiopulmonary disease) to 82% (sex selection); willingness to assist ranged from 64% (sex selection) to 93% (cardiopulmonary disease). Excluding sex selection, objection was less likely among ob-gyns who were female (odds ratio [OR] 0.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4-0.8), urban (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.7), or Jewish (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.7) compared with male, rural, or religiously unaffiliated ob-gyns. Objection was more likely among ob-gyns from the South (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.0) or Midwest (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.1), and among Catholic, Evangelical Protestant, or Muslim ob-gyns, or those for whom religion was most important, compared with reference. Among ob-gyns who objected to abortion in a given case, approximately two-thirds would help patients obtain an abortion. Excluding sex selection, assistance despite objection was more likely among female (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-2.9) and United States-born ob-gyns (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.7) and less likely among southern ob-gyns (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.6) or those for whom religion was most important (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.7).
conclusionMost ob-gyns help patients obtain an abortion even when they morally object to abortion in that case. Willingness to assist varies by clinical context and physician characteristics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.