Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21934454›Full record

Trial reportObstetrics and gynecology2011

Contraceptive choices, pregnancy rates, and outcomes in a microbicide trial.

Sengeziwe Sibeko, Cheryl Baxter, Nonhlanhla Yende, Quarraisha Abdool Karim, Salim S Abdool Karim

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Contraceptives and sexual behaviours in predicting pregnancy rates in HIV prevention trials in South Africa: Past, present and future implications.Sexual & reproductive healthcare : official journal of the Swedish Association of Midwives · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sengeziwe SibekoCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa, Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa. sibekos1@ukzn.ac.za
Cheryl Baxter
Nonhlanhla Yende
Quarraisha Abdool Karim
Salim S Abdool Karim

Funding

Microbicide Trials NetworkU01AI068633 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI HILLIER, SHARON L. · 2006 to 2010
$77.0M
HIV PREVENTION TRIALS NETWORK LEADERSHIP GROUPU01AI046749 · NIAID · FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL · PI CATES, WILLARD · 1999 to 2005
$73.5M
HIV Prevention trials Network (HPTN) Coordinating and Operations CenterU01AI068619 · NIAID · FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL · PI VERMUND, STEN H. · 2006 to 2010
$72.7M
The Viral Set Point in HIV-1 Subtype C InfectionU19AI051794 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL · PI ABDOOL KARIM, SALIM S · 2002 to 2007
$22.5M
TUBERCULOSIS SUPPLEMENTD43TW000231 · FIC · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI ABDOOL KARIM, QUARRAISHA · 1993 to 2014
$13.1M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW000231FIC NIH HHS D43TW00231NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI046749NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI068619NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI068633NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI051794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWomen who become pregnant during the conduct of biomedical human immunodeficiency virus prevention trials are taken off the study product for safety reasons. High pregnancy rates can compromise statistical integrity in these trials. The comprehensive contraceptive curriculum developed for the Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA) 004 trial was evaluated for its ability to enhance contraceptive uptake, reduce pregnancy rates, and preserve statistical integrity.

methodsContraceptive- and pregnancy-related eligibility criteria were specified in the protocol. We enrolled women who opted for a nonbarrier method of contraceptive and provided hormonal contraceptives onsite at no cost. At each monthly study visit, we provided pregnancy prevention counseling and performed pregnancy testing. Study product was withheld on pregnancy diagnosis, but women continued with monthly follow-up.

resultsContraceptive use was high throughout the study with 100% uptake at baseline and 94.71% use after a mean of 18 months follow-up at exit. Injectable progestins, particularly medroxyprogesterone acetate, remained the preferred choice of contraceptive. After 30 months of follow-up, 54 pregnancies were reported out of 889 participants, giving a pregnancy incidence rate of 3.95 per 100 woman-years (95% confidence interval 2.96-5.17). Of all pregnancies, two thirds (64.81%) resulted in a full-term live birth, whereas 18.52% and 11.11% pregnancies culminated as miscarriage and terminated pregnancies, respectively. There were no congenital anomalies in the early neonatal period. Pregnancies resulted in 1.56% of woman-years of study follow-up lost as a result of temporary product withdrawal.

conclusionThe CAPRISA 004 contraceptive curriculum was an effective strategy for maintaining low pregnancy rates, thereby minimizing product withdrawal and loss of follow-up time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Pregnancy RateAdenineAdolescentAdultAnti-HIV AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsContraceptive AgentsContraceptive Agents, FemaleFemaleHumansMedroxyprogesterone AcetateOrganophosphonatesPregnancyProgestinsSouth AfricaTenofovirAdenineAnti-HIV AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsContraceptive AgentsContraceptive Agents, FemaleMedroxyprogesterone AcetateOrganophosphonatesProgestinsTenofovir

Identifiers

PMID21934454
PMCPMC3178043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.