Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21933959›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2011

Integrated NY-ESO-1 antibody and CD8+ T-cell responses correlate with clinical benefit in advanced melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab.

Jianda Yuan, Matthew Adamow, Brian A Ginsberg, Teresa S Rasalan, Erika Ritter, Humilidad F Gallardo, Yinyan Xu, Evelina Pogoriler, Stephanie L Terzulli, Deborah Kuk and 9 more

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 191 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
191citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04441138 phase2terminatednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Phase II Trial of Concurrent, Split Course Chemoradiation Followed by Durvalumab (MEDI4736) in Poor Risk and/or Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorRush University Medical CenterRan2021 to 2024Enrolled10ConditionsStage III Non-small-cell Lung CancerArmsDurvalumab
NCT04765709 phase2terminatednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

BRIDGE Trial: Phase II Trial of durvalumaB and chemotheRapy Induction Followed by Durvalumab and Radiotherapy in larGe volumE Stage III NSCLC

TypeinterventionalSponsorMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological ResearchRan2021 to 2025Enrolled10ConditionsNon-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIIArmsdurvalumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (cisplatin or carboplatin plus vinorelbine or pemetrexed), Durvalumab plus radiotherapy, durvalumab
NCT05568212 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Phase II, Two-cohorts, Randomized Trial Comparing Standard of Care Versus Immune- Based Combination in Relapsed Stage III Non-small-cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Pretreated With Chemoradiotherapy and Durvalumab (MEDI4736)

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione Ricerca TraslazionaleRan2022 to 2027Enrolled176ConditionsNon-small-cell Lung Cancer PatientsArmsDurvalumab, Olaparib tablet, Single-agent chemotherapy, Platinum doublet chemotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

191 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Humoral Immune Response against Nontargeted Tumor Antigens after Treatment with Sipuleucel-T and Its Association with Improved Clinical Outcome.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2015
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Induction of robust type-I CD8+ T-cell responses in WHO grade 2 low-grade glioma patients receiving peptide-based vaccines in combination with poly-ICLC.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2015
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

131 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jianda YuanLudwig Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, Immunology Program, Sloan-Kettering Institute, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Matthew Adamow
Brian A Ginsberg
Teresa S Rasalan
Erika Ritter
Humilidad F Gallardo
Yinyan Xu
Evelina Pogoriler
Stephanie L Terzulli
Deborah Kuk
Katherine S Panageas
Gerd Ritter
Mario Sznol
Ruth Halaban
Achim A Jungbluth
James P Allison
Lloyd J Old
Jedd D Wolchok
Sacha Gnjatic

Funding

Yale SPORE in Skin CancerP50CA121974 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID F STERN · 2006 to 2026
$43.9M
TREATMENT OF CANCER PATIENTS WITH THYMIC FACTORSP01CA033049 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI DIVGI, CHAITANYA R. · 1985 to 2009
$19.8M
NCI NIH HHS 1 P50 CA121974NCI NIH HHS P01 CA033049NCI NIH HHS P01CA33049NCI NIH HHS P50 CA121974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ipilimumab, a monoclonal antibody against cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), has been shown to improve survival in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma. It also enhances immunity to NY-ESO-1, a cancer/testis antigen expressed in a subset of patients with melanoma. To characterize the association between immune response and clinical outcome, we first analyzed NY-ESO-1 serum antibody by ELISA in 144 ipilimumab-treated patients with melanoma and found 22 of 140 (16%) seropositive at baseline and 31 of 144 (22%) seropositive following treatment. These NY-ESO-1-seropositive patients had a greater likelihood of experiencing clinical benefit 24 wk after ipilimumab treatment than NY-ESO-1-seronegative patients (P = 0.02, relative risk = 1.8, two-tailed Fisher test). To understand why some patients with NY-ESO-1 antibody failed to experience clinical benefit, we analyzed NY-ESO-1-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell responses by intracellular multicytokine staining in 20 NY-ESO-1-seropositive patients and found a surprising dissociation between NY-ESO-1 antibody and CD8 responses in some patients. NY-ESO-1-seropositive patients with associated CD8(+) T cells experienced more frequent clinical benefit (10 of 13; 77%) than those with undetectable CD8(+) T-cell response (one of seven; 14%; P = 0.02; relative risk = 5.4, two-tailed Fisher test), as well as a significant survival advantage (P = 0.01; hazard ratio = 0.2, time-dependent Cox model). Together, our data suggest that integrated NY-ESO-1 immune responses may have predictive value for ipilimumab treatment and argue for prospective studies in patients with established NY-ESO-1 immunity. The current findings provide a strong rationale for the clinical use of modulators of immunosuppression with concurrent approaches to favor tumor antigen-specific immune responses, such as vaccines or adoptive transfer, in patients with cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, NeoplasmCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCTLA-4 AntigenEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansImmunohistochemistryIpilimumabMelanomaMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsSurvival AnalysisAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, NeoplasmCTAG1B protein, humanCTLA-4 AntigenIpilimumabMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21933959
PMCPMC3189057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.