Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21933824›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2011

The effects of hourly differences in air pollution on the risk of myocardial infarction: case crossover analysis of the MINAP database.

Krishnan Bhaskaran, Shakoor Hajat, Ben Armstrong, Andy Haines, Emily Herrett, Paul Wilkinson, Liam Smeeth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Epidemiological and mechanistic links between PMFrontiers in endocrinology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Association between PMBMC public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Modeling the Exposome in Murine Cardiovascular Disease.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Krishnan BhaskaranLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. krishnan.bhaskaran@lshtm.ac.uk
Shakoor Hajat
Ben Armstrong
Andy Haines
Emily Herrett
Paul Wilkinson
Liam Smeeth

Funding

British Heart FoundationWellcome Trust 076583/Z/05/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate associations between air pollution levels and myocardial infarction (MI) on short timescales, with data at an hourly temporal resolution.

designTime stratified case crossover study linking clinical data from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) with PM(10), ozone, CO, NO(2), and SO(2) data from the UK National Air Quality Archive. Pollution effects were investigated with delays (lags) of 1-6, 7-12, 13-18, 19-24, and 25-72 hours in both single and multi-pollutant models, adjusted for ambient temperature, relative humidity, circulating levels of influenza and respiratory syncytial virus, day of week, holidays, and residual seasonality within calendar month strata.

settingPopulation based study in 15 conurbations in England and Wales. SUBJECTS: 79,288 diagnoses of myocardial infarction recorded over the period 2003-6.

main outcome measuresExcess risk of myocardial infarction per 10 µg/m(3) increase in pollutant level.

resultsIn single pollutant models, PM(10) and NO(2) levels were associated with a very short term increase in risk of myocardial infarction 1-6 hours later (excess risks 1.2% (95% confidence interval 0.3 to 2.1) and 1.1% (0.3 to 1.8) respectively per 10 μg/m(3) increase); the effects persisted in multi-pollutant models, though with only weak evidence of an independent PM(10) effect (P = 0.05). The immediate risk increases were followed by reductions in risk at longer lags: we found no evidence of any net excess risk associated with the five pollutants studied over a 72 hour period after exposure.

conclusionsHigher levels of PM(10) and NO(2), which are typically markers of traffic related pollution, seem to be associated with transiently increased risk of myocardial infarction 1-6 hours after exposure, but later reductions in risk suggest that air pollution may be associated with bringing events forward in time ("short-term displacement") rather than increasing overall risk. The well established effect of air pollution on cardiorespiratory mortality may not be mediated through increasing the acute risk of myocardial infarction, but through another mechanism.

Indexed as

Air PollutionAgedAged, 80 and overAir PollutantsCase-Control StudiesCross-Over StudiesEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionRisk FactorsSeasonsSensitivity and SpecificityTemperatureAir Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID21933824
PMCPMC3176903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.