Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21933777›Full record

ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2012

A Gaussian copula approach for the analysis of secondary phenotypes in case-control genetic association studies.

Jing He, Hongzhe Li, Andrew C Edmondson, Daniel J Rader, Mingyao Li

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Quantitative trait analysis in sequencing studies under trait-dependent sampling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jing HeDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Hongzhe Li
Andrew C Edmondson
Daniel J Rader
Mingyao Li
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Genetics of Elevated High Density Lipoprotein CholesterolR01HL089309 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI RADER, DANIEL JAMES · 2008 to 2012
$3.9M
Developing Statistical Methods for Disease Gene DiscoveryR01HG004517 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LI, CHUN, LI, MINGYAO · 2008 to 2012
$1.9M
Statistical Methods for Gene Mapping Studies in Admixed PopulationsR01HG005854 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LI, MINGYAO · 2010 to 2012
$978k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004517NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG004517NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005854NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG005854NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL089309NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL089309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many case-control genetic association studies, a set of correlated secondary phenotypes that may share common genetic factors with disease status are collected. Examination of these secondary phenotypes can yield valuable insights about the disease etiology and supplement the main studies. However, due to unequal sampling probabilities between cases and controls, standard regression analysis that assesses the effect of SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) on secondary phenotypes using cases only, controls only, or combined samples of cases and controls can yield inflated type I error rates when the test SNP is associated with the disease. To solve this issue, we propose a Gaussian copula-based approach that efficiently models the dependence between disease status and secondary phenotypes. Through simulations, we show that our method yields correct type I error rates for the analysis of secondary phenotypes under a wide range of situations. To illustrate the effectiveness of our method in the analysis of real data, we applied our method to a genome-wide association study on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), where "cases" are defined as individuals with extremely high HDL-C level and "controls" are defined as those with low HDL-C level. We treated 4 quantitative traits with varying degrees of correlation with HDL-C as secondary phenotypes and tested for association with SNPs in LIPG, a gene that is well known to be associated with HDL-C. We show that when the correlation between the primary and secondary phenotypes is >0.2, the P values from case-control combined unadjusted analysis are much more significant than methods that aim to correct for ascertainment bias. Our results suggest that to avoid false-positive associations, it is important to appropriately model secondary phenotypes in case-control genetic association studies.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalNormal DistributionCase-Control StudiesCholesterol, HDLGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansLipasePhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideCholesterol, HDLLipaseLIPG protein, human

Identifiers

PMID21933777
PMCPMC3372941
OpenAlexW2106575037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.