Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21933682›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2012

Characterization of [³H]CFT binding to the norepinephrine transporter suggests that binding of CFT and nisoxetine is not mutually exclusive.

Juan Zhen, Solav Ali, Aloke K Dutta, Maarten E A Reith

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The influence of genetic variants on striatal dopamine transporter and D2 receptor binding after TBI.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2014
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juan ZhenDepartment of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, Room MHL HN-518, 550 First Ave., New York, NY 10016, USA. juan.zhen@nyumc.org
Solav Ali
Aloke K Dutta
Maarten E A Reith
New York University · USWayne State University · US

Funding

Novel Neuroprotective Treatment for Parkinson's DiseaseR01NS047198 · NINDS · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DUTTA, ALOKE K · 2005 to 2015
$3.7M
Dopamine Transporters: Mechanisms of Ligand InteractionR01DA019676 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI REITH, MAARTEN E · 2006 to 2016
$2.9M
Novel Triple Uptake Inhibitors for Treatment of DepressionR01MH084888 · NIMH · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DUTTA, ALOKE K · 2009 to 2013
$1.9M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA019676NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084888NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS047198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The norepinephrine transporter (NET) is an important target for a wide variety of antidepressants and psychostimulants. Despite its prominence as a drug target, there is only one radioligand in use for NET competitive binding assays, [(3)H]nisoxetine. However, traditional [(3)H]nisoxetine binding protocols often give an underestimation for the affinity of certain classes of NET ligands, particularly cocaine and other tropanes. Here, we explore the feasibility of using the phenyltropane [(3)H]CFT for labeling human NET (hNET) in heterologous cell-based binding studies. Assays were optimized for time and protein content and specific, one-site binding was observed. Potencies of tested NET ligands for inhibition of [(3)H]CFT binding to whole cells (at physiological [Na(+)] and 25°C) were similar to potencies observed in the [(3)H]NE uptake assay. Inhibition constants (K(i)) for binding assays were highly correlated with uptake inhibition constants for all compounds tested (R(2)=0.99, p<0.0001). Cell-free membrane preparations did not display the same pharmacological profile. Under conditions routinely used for measuring [(3)H]nisoxetine binding to membrane preparations (4°C for 3h, [Na(+)] at 295 mM), the potency of nisoxetine and desipramine in inhibiting [(3)H]CFT binding became greater than that measured in a functional assay of [(3)H]NE uptake at physiological [Na(+)]. However, the opposite was true for CFT and cocaine. Interestingly, while investigating [(3)H]CFT as a potential NET radioligand, we uncovered evidence suggesting that CFT and nisoxetine are not mutually exclusive in binding to the NET. Dixon plots of the interaction between nisoxetine and CFT in inhibition of [(3)H]dopamine uptake by the NET indicate that the two compounds can simultaneously bind to the transporter.

Indexed as

Binding, CompetitiveCocaineFluoxetineHEK293 CellsHumansNorepinephrine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsRadioligand AssayRadiopharmaceuticalsTritium(1R-(exo,exo))-3-(4-fluorophenyl)-8-methyl-8- azabicyclo(3.2.1)octane-2-carboxylic acid, methyl esterCocaineFluoxetinenisoxetineNorepinephrine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsRadiopharmaceuticalsTritium

Identifiers

PMID21933682
PMCPMC3221803
OpenAlexW1971090338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.