Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21933025›Full record

ReviewStem cells and development2012

Control dominating subclones for managing cancer progression and posttreatment recurrence by subclonal switchboard signal: implication for new therapies.

Shengwen Calvin Li, Katherine L Lee, Jane Luo

Abstract readLetterReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cells and development, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Functional endoscopy techniques for tracking stem cell fate.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2019
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shengwen Calvin Li
Katherine L Lee
Jane Luo

Funding

IDENTIFICATION OF CAVEOLIN-INTERACTING MOLECULESF32CA071326 · NCI · WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI LI, SHENGWEN CALVIN · 1996 to 1998
–
NCI NIH HHS F32 CA071326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contrast to hematological malignancies, meaningful improvements in survival statistics for patients with malignant brain tumors have not been realized in >40 years of clinical research. Clearly, a new medical approach to brain cancers is needed. Recent research has led to a new concept that needs to destroy all cancer subclones to control the cancer progression. However, this new concept fails to distinguish the difference between dominating subclones and dormant subclones. Here, we address the issue of clonal switch and emphasize that there may be one or more than one dominant clones within the tumor mass at any time. Destructing one dominant clone triggers activating other dormant subclones to become dominating subclones, causing cancer progress and post-treatment cancer recurrence. We postulate the concept of subclonal switchboard signaling and the pathway that involved in this process. In the context of stem cell and development, there is a parallel with the concept of quiescent/dormant cancer stem cells (CSC) and their progeny, the differentiated cancer cells; these 2 populations communicate and co-exist. The mechanism with which determines to extend self-renewal and expansion of CSC is needed to elucidate. We suggest eliminating the "dominating subclonal switchboard signals" that shift the dormant subclones to dominating subclones as a new strategy.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationModels, BiologicalBrain NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionHumansNeoplastic Stem CellsSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID21933025
PMCPMC6916525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.