ArticlePloS one2011
Transcription factor binding site positioning in yeast: proximal promoter motifs characterize TATA-less promoters.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- The shape of fitness functions and the distribution of mutational effect sizes jointly limit adaptation by regulatory mutations.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Article
- Species-aware DNA language models capture regulatory elements and their evolution.Genome biology · 2024Article
- FUN-PROSE: A deep learning approach to predict condition-specific gene expression in fungi.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Deciphering eukaryotic gene-regulatory logic with 100 million random promoters.Nature biotechnology · 2020Article
- SalMotifDB: a tool for analyzing putative transcription factor binding sites in salmonid genomes.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Sumoylation of DNA-bound transcription factor Sko1 prevents its association with nontarget promoters.PLoS genetics · 2019Article
- Article
- Article
- 3D clustering of co-regulated genes and its effect on gene expression.Current genetics · 2017Review
- Molecular mechanisms that distinguish TFIID housekeeping from regulatable SAGA promoters.The EMBO journal · 2017Article
- Genome-wide comparative analysis ofPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2017Article
- Synthetic Promoters and Transcription Factors for Heterologous Protein Expression inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2017Article
- Developmentally regulated internal transcription initiation during meiosis in budding yeast.PloS one · 2017Article
- Mediator binding to UASs is broadly uncoupled from transcription and cooperative with TFIID recruitment to promoters.The EMBO journal · 2016Article
- Genome-wide mapping of nucleosome positions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to different nitrogen conditions.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Maximal Expression of the Evolutionarily Conserved Slit2 Gene Promoter Requires Sp1.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2016Article
- Impact of cis-acting elements' frequency in transcription activity in dicot and monocot plants.3 Biotech · 2015Article
- The development and characterization of synthetic minimal yeast promoters.Nature communications · 2015Article
- A unified model for yeast transcript definition.Genome research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The availability of sequence specificities for a substantial fraction of yeast's transcription factors and comparative genomic algorithms for binding site prediction has made it possible to comprehensively annotate transcription factor binding sites genome-wide. Here we use such a genome-wide annotation for comprehensively studying promoter architecture in yeast, focusing on the distribution of transcription factor binding sites relative to transcription start sites, and the architecture of TATA and TATA-less promoters. For most transcription factors, binding sites are positioned further upstream and vary over a wider range in TATA promoters than in TATA-less promoters. In contrast, a group of 6 'proximal promoter motifs' (GAT1/GLN3/DAL80, FKH1/2, PBF1/2, RPN4, NDT80, and ROX1) occur preferentially in TATA-less promoters and show a strong preference for binding close to the transcription start site in these promoters. We provide evidence that suggests that pre-initiation complexes are recruited at TATA sites in TATA promoters and at the sites of the other proximal promoter motifs in TATA-less promoters. TATA-less promoters can generally be classified by the proximal promoter motif they contain, with different classes of TATA-less promoters showing different patterns of transcription factor binding site positioning and nucleosome coverage. These observations suggest that different modes of regulation of transcription initiation may be operating in the different promoter classes. In addition we show that, across all promoter classes, there is a close match between nucleosome free regions and regions of highest transcription factor binding site density. This close agreement between transcription factor binding site density and nucleosome depletion suggests a direct and general competition between transcription factors and nucleosomes for binding to promoters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.