ArticlePLoS computational biology2011
A combined experimental and mathematical approach for molecular-based optimization of irinotecan circadian delivery.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circadian Disruption as a Determinant of the Tumor Temporal State in Colorectal Cancer: A PRISMA-Based Systematic Review Integrating Metabolism, Immunity, and Metastasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Sex-dependent least toxic timing of irinotecan combined with chronomodulated chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: Randomized multicenter EORTC 05011 trial.Cancer medicine · 2020Trial
- The Gastro-Circadian Metabolic Axis: A Comprehensive Framework for Chronotherapy in Gastroenterology.Cureus · 2026Review
- Chronobiome medicine: circadian regulation of host-microbiota crosstalk in systemic physiology.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- An integrative mathematical model for timing treatment toxicity and Zeitgeber impact in colorectal cancer cells.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2023Article
- Modeling the Circadian Control of the Cell Cycle and Its Consequences for Cancer Chronotherapy.Biology · 2023Article
- Circadian clock as a possible control point in colorectal cancer progression (Review).International journal of oncology · 2022Review
- Antiproliferative Effects of Cynara Cardunculus in Colorectal Cancer Cells Are Modulated by the Circadian Clock.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- The Daily Expression of ABCC4 at the BCSFB Affects the Transport of Its Substrate Methotrexate.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Circadian Rhythms, Disease and Chronotherapy.Journal of biological rhythms · 2021Review
- Circadian clocks regulate cardiac arrhythmia susceptibility, repolarization, and ion channels.Current opinion in pharmacology · 2021Review
- A mathematical model of the circadian clock and drug pharmacology to optimize irinotecan administration timing in colorectal cancer.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- An Optimal Time for Treatment-Predicting Circadian Time by Machine Learning and Mathematical Modelling.Cancers · 2020Review
- Optimizing circadian drug infusion schedules towards personalized cancer chronotherapy.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Sex-, feeding-, and circadian time-dependency of P-glycoprotein expression and activity - implications for mechanistic pharmacokinetics modeling.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Article
- Circadian-Hypoxia Link and its Potential for Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease.Current pharmaceutical design · 2019Review
- A Systems-Level Analysis Reveals Circadian Regulation of Splicing in Colorectal Cancer.EBioMedicine · 2018Article
- Dosing time dependent in vitro pharmacodynamics of Everolimus despite a defective circadian clock.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2018Article
- Molecular Aspects of Circadian Pharmacology and Relevance for Cancer Chronotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Circadian timing largely modifies efficacy and toxicity of many anticancer drugs. Recent findings suggest that optimal circadian delivery patterns depend on the patient genetic background. We present here a combined experimental and mathematical approach for the design of chronomodulated administration schedules tailored to the patient molecular profile. As a proof of concept we optimized exposure of Caco-2 colon cancer cells to irinotecan (CPT11), a cytotoxic drug approved for the treatment of colorectal cancer. CPT11 was bioactivated into SN38 and its efflux was mediated by ATP-Binding-Cassette (ABC) transporters in Caco-2 cells. After cell synchronization with a serum shock defining Circadian Time (CT) 0, circadian rhythms with a period of 26 h 50 (SD 63 min) were observed in the mRNA expression of clock genes REV-ERBα, PER2, BMAL1, the drug target topoisomerase 1 (TOP1), the activation enzyme carboxylesterase 2 (CES2), the deactivation enzyme UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1, polypeptide A1 (UGT1A1), and efflux transporters ABCB1, ABCC1, ABCC2 and ABCG2. DNA-bound TOP1 protein amount in presence of CPT11, a marker of the drug PD, also displayed circadian variations. A mathematical model of CPT11 molecular pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics (PK-PD) was designed and fitted to experimental data. It predicted that CPT11 bioactivation was the main determinant of CPT11 PD circadian rhythm. We then adopted the therapeutics strategy of maximizing efficacy in non-synchronized cells, considered as cancer cells, under a constraint of maximum toxicity in synchronized cells, representing healthy ones. We considered exposure schemes in the form of an initial concentration of CPT11 given at a particular CT, over a duration ranging from 1 to 27 h. For any dose of CPT11, optimal exposure durations varied from 3h40 to 7h10. Optimal schemes started between CT2h10 and CT2h30, a time interval corresponding to 1h30 to 1h50 before the nadir of CPT11 bioactivation rhythm in healthy cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.