Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21931350›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2011

Intracranial aneurysms: from vessel wall pathology to therapeutic approach.

Timo Krings, Daniel M Mandell, Tim-Rasmus Kiehl, Sasikhan Geibprasert, Michael Tymianski, Hortensia Alvarez, Karel G terBrugge, Franz-Josef Hans

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 192 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Timo KringsDivision of Neuroradiology, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada. timo.krings@uhn.ca
Daniel M Mandell
Tim-Rasmus Kiehl
Sasikhan Geibprasert
Michael Tymianski
Hortensia Alvarez
Karel G terBrugge
Franz-Josef Hans
Toronto Western Hospital · CAUniversitätsklinikum Aachen · DEUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An aneurysm is a focal dilatation of an arterial blood vessel. Luminal forces, such as high blood flow, shear stress and turbulence, are implicated in the pathogenesis of intracranial aneurysms, and luminal characteristics, such as sac size and morphology, are usually essential to the clinical decision-making process. Despite frequent clinical emphasis on the vessel lumen, however, the pathology underlying the formation, growth and rupture of an aneurysm mainly resides in the vessel wall. Research on the morphology and histopathology of the vessel wall reveals that intracranial aneurysms do not constitute a single disease, but are a shared manifestation of a wide range of diseases, each of which has a unique natural history and optimum therapy. This Review classifies intracranial aneurysms by vessel wall pathology, and demonstrates that understanding the morphology and pathology of this structure is important in determining the therapeutic approach. The article concludes that aneurysms represent a symptom of an underlying vascular disease rather than constituting a disease on their own.

Indexed as

Blood VesselsEndovascular ProceduresHumansIntracranial AneurysmSurgical Instruments

Identifiers

PMID21931350
OpenAlexW2075726719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.