Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21931319›Full record

SynthesisMolecular psychiatry2012

Omega-3 fatty acids for the treatment of depression: systematic review and meta-analysis.

M H Bloch, J Hannestad

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Molecular psychiatry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 133 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
133citing papers in PubMed, 17 pooled it
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03143075 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Do Omega-3 Fatty Acids Have an Antidepressant Effect in Patients With Signs of Peripheral Inflammation?

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion SkaneRan2017 to 2023Enrolled95ConditionsMajor Depressive DisorderArmsEicosapentaenoic acid enriched omega-3 fatty acids, 2 g/day
NCT03295708 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Safety, Effectiveness, and Mechanism of Fish Oil as Adjunct Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder - a 12-month Randomized, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSecond Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityRan2017 to 2020Enrolled120ConditionsMajor Depressive DisorderArmsfish oil capsule, soybean oil capsule
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

133 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 292 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Efficacy of omega-3 highly unsaturated fatty acids in the treatment of depression.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2016
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Omega-3 fatty acids for depression in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M H BlochDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. michael.bloch@yale.edu
J Hannestad
Yale University · US

Funding

YALE UNIVERSITY CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARD PROGRAMUL1RR024139 · NCRR · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHERWIN, ROBERT S · 2006 to 2011
$56.8M
Research Training for Medical Students & Physician-Scientists in Child PsychiatryR25MH077823 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ANDRES S MARTIN · 2006 to 2026
$4.0M
Longitudinal Structural MRI Study of Adulthood Outcome in Tourette SyndromeK23MH091240 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BLOCH, MICHAEL H · 2010 to 2014
$902k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024139NIMH NIH HHS 1K23MH091240-01NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH091240NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH077823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials of omega-3 fatty acid (FA) treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in order to determine efficacy and to examine sources of heterogeneity between trials. PubMed (1965-May 2010) was searched for randomized, placebo-controlled trials of omega-3 FAs for MDD. Our primary outcome measure was standardized mean difference in a clinical measure of depression severity. In stratified meta-analysis, we examined the effects of trial duration, trial methodological quality, baseline depression severity, diagnostic indication, dose of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in omega-3 preparations, and whether omega-3 FA was given as monotherapy or augmentation. In 13 randomized, placebo-controlled trials examining the efficacy of omega-3 FAs involving 731 participants, meta-analysis demonstrated no significant benefit of omega-3 FA treatment compared with placebo (standard mean difference (SMD)=0.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.04, 0.26). Meta-analysis demonstrated significant heterogeneity and publication bias. Nearly all evidence of omega-3 benefit was removed after adjusting for publication bias using the trim-and-fill method (SMD=0.01, 95% CI: -0.13, 0.15). Secondary analyses suggested a trend toward increased efficacy of omega-3 FAs in trials of lower methodological quality, trials of shorter duration, trials which utilized completers rather than intention-to-treat analysis, and trials in which study participants had greater baseline depression severity. Current published trials suggest a small, non-significant benefit of omega-3 FAs for major depression. Nearly all of the treatment efficacy observed in the published literature may be attributable to publication bias.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsFatty Acids, Omega-3HumansMajor Depressive DisorderPublication BiasRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicFatty Acids, Omega-3

Identifiers

PMID21931319
PMCPMC3625950
OpenAlexW2051707350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.