Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21931220›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography2011

Can radiation damage to protein crystals be reduced using small-molecule compounds?

Jan Kmetko, Matthew Warkentin, Ulrich Englich, Robert E Thorne

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Separating the effects of temperature and absorbed X-ray dose on unit-cell volume.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026
    Article
  2. B-factor accuracy in protein crystal structures.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Estimate your dose: RADDOSE-3D.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. In meso in situ serial X-ray crystallography of soluble and membrane proteins.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography · 2015
    Article
  13. Temperature-dependent radiation sensitivity and order of 70S ribosome crystals.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. To scavenge or not to scavenge, that is STILL the question.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2013
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Spatial distribution of radiation damage to crystalline proteins at 25-300 K.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jan KmetkoPhysics Department, Kenyon College, Gambier, OH 43022, USA.
Matthew Warkentin
Ulrich Englich
Robert E Thorne
Cornell University · USKenyon College · US

Funding

ZINC FINGER-DNA COMPLEXP41RR001646 · NCRR · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI CINGOLANI, GINO · 1985 to 2011
$23.8M
New Approaches to Radiation Damage and CryoprotectionR01GM065981 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI THORNE, ROBERT E. · 2002 to 2010
$1.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCRR NIH HHS P41 RR001646NCRR NIH HHS RR-01646NIGMS NIH HHS DMR-0225180NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065981NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM65981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have defined a data-collection protocol and a metric that provide a robust measure of global radiation damage to protein crystals. Using this protocol and metric, 19 small-molecule compounds (introduced either by cocrystallization or soaking) were evaluated for their ability to protect lysozyme crystals from radiation damage. The compounds were selected based upon their ability to interact with radiolytic products (e.g. hydrated electrons, hydrogen, hydroxyl and perhydroxyl radicals) and/or their efficacy in protecting biological molecules from radiation damage in dilute aqueous solutions. At room temperature, 12 compounds had no effect and six had a sensitizing effect on global damage. Only one compound, sodium nitrate, appeared to extend crystal lifetimes, but not in all proteins and only by a factor of two or less. No compound provided protection at T=100 K. Scavengers are ineffective in protecting protein crystals from global damage because a large fraction of primary X-ray-induced excitations are generated in and/or directly attack the protein and because the ratio of scavenger molecules to protein molecules is too small to provide appreciable competitive protection. The same reactivity that makes some scavengers effective radioprotectors in protein solutions may explain their sensitizing effect in the protein-dense environment of a crystal. A more productive focus for future efforts may be to identify and eliminate sensitizing compounds from crystallization solutions.

Indexed as

CrystallizationCrystallography, X-RayHydroxyl RadicalMuramidaseNitratesProtein ConformationProteinsSolutionsTemperatureHydroxyl RadicalMuramidaseNitratesProteinssodium nitrateSolutions

Identifiers

PMID21931220
PMCPMC3176623
OpenAlexW2016306986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.