Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21930943›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2011

Quantifying why urea is a protein denaturant, whereas glycine betaine is a protein stabilizer.

Emily J Guinn, Laurel M Pegram, Michael W Capp, Michelle N Pollock, M Thomas Record

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 229 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Changes in Water Dynamics by Osmolytes Regulate Enzyme Activity.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Crowding-induced stabilization and destabilization in a single protein.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Osmolyte-induced protein stability changes explained by graph theory.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  9. Salt Effects on Caffeine across Concentration Regimes.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Atomic view of cosolute-induced protein denaturation probed by NMR solvent paramagnetic relaxation enhancement.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  16. Heterologous Production of Glycine Betaine UsingFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Dynamical Model for the Counteracting Effects of TrimethylamineThe journal of physical chemistry. B · 2020
    Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily J GuinnDepartments of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Laurel M Pegram
Michael W Capp
Michelle N Pollock
M Thomas Record
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

THERMODYNAMIC AND NMR STUDIES ON THE E COLI CYTOPLASMR01GM047022 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI RECORD, M. THOMAS · 1992 to 2015
$4.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 47022NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM047022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To explain the large, opposite effects of urea and glycine betaine (GB) on stability of folded proteins and protein complexes, we quantify and interpret preferential interactions of urea with 45 model compounds displaying protein functional groups and compare with a previous analysis of GB. This information is needed to use urea as a probe of coupled folding in protein processes and to tune molecular dynamics force fields. Preferential interactions between urea and model compounds relative to their interactions with water are determined by osmometry or solubility and dissected using a unique coarse-grained analysis to obtain interaction potentials quantifying the interaction of urea with each significant type of protein surface (aliphatic, aromatic hydrocarbon (C); polar and charged N and O). Microscopic local-bulk partition coefficients K(p) for the accumulation or exclusion of urea in the water of hydration of these surfaces relative to bulk water are obtained. K(p) values reveal that urea accumulates moderately at amide O and weakly at aliphatic C, whereas GB is excluded from both. These results provide both thermodynamic and molecular explanations for the opposite effects of urea and glycine betaine on protein stability, as well as deductions about strengths of amide NH--amide O and amide NH--amide N hydrogen bonds relative to hydrogen bonds to water. Interestingly, urea, like GB, is moderately accumulated at aromatic C surface. Urea m-values for protein folding and other protein processes are quantitatively interpreted and predicted using these urea interaction potentials or K(p) values.

Indexed as

BetaineBinding SitesHydrogen BondingModels, ChemicalMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein DenaturationProtein FoldingProteinsProtein StabilityUreaBetaineProteinsUrea

Identifiers

PMID21930943
PMCPMC3193240
OpenAlexW1967362126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.