Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21930597›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2011

Differential effects of myosin light chain kinase inhibition on contractility, force development and myosin light chain 20 phosphorylation of rat cervical and thoracic duct lymphatics.

Zhanna V Nepiyushchikh, Sanjukta Chakraborty, Wei Wang, Michael J Davis, David C Zawieja, Mariappan Muthuchamy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. KAmerican journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Roles of sarcoplasmic reticulum CaScientific reports · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Regulation of pulmonary endothelial barrier function by kinases.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhanna V NepiyushchikhDepartment of Systems Biology and Translational Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Division of Lymphatic Biology, Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, 336 Reynolds Medical Building, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Sanjukta Chakraborty
Wei Wang
Michael J Davis
David C Zawieja
Mariappan Muthuchamy
Texas A&M Health Science Center · USUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms of Lymphatic Muscle ContractionR01HL080526 · NHLBI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI MUTHUCHAMY, MARIAPPAN · 2005 to 2009
$1.7M
Cellular Mechanisms of Lymphatic Muscle ContractilityR01HL089784 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI DAVIS, MICHAEL JOHN · 2008 to 2012
$1.7M
Ionic Mechanisms of Stretch-Activation in Muscular LymphaticsR01HL096552 · NHLBI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI VON DER WEID, PIERRE-YVES, ZAWIEJA, DAVID CARL · 2009 to 2012
$1.7M
Physiological Basis of Vascular ContractilityR01HL075199 · NHLBI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI ZAWIEJA, DAVID CARL · 2003 to 2006
$1.4M
Regulatory Mechanisms in Lymphatic Muscle ContractionK02HL086650 · NHLBI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI MUTHUCHAMY, MARIAPPAN · 2007 to 2011
$502k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL-089784NHLBI NIH HHS K02 HL086650NHLBI NIH HHS K02 HL86650NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL075199NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL080526NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL089784NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL096552NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL75199NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL80526NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL96552
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intrinsic contractile activity of lymphatics varies in different regions of the body. We have previously shown that cervical lymphatics possess an inherently higher frequency but lower tone at a given pressure when compared to thoracic duct lymphatics. However, the molecular mechanisms modulating the contractile characteristics of these lymphatics are not well understood. Since myosin light chain 20 (MLC(20)) phosphorylation appears to underlie the tonic component of lymphatic contraction, we hypothesized that the thoracic duct would be more sensitive to the modulation of MLC(20) phosphorylation when compared to cervical lymphatics. To test our hypothesis, the contractile activities and MLC(20) phosphorylation of thoracic duct and cervical lymphatics were determined in the absence or presence of the specific myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) inhibitor ML-7 under both isobaric and isometric conditions. Addition of ML-7 at each concentration tested led to a decrease in tone in both vessel types. While ML-7 (10(-6) m) significantly reduced the phasic contraction frequency of cervical lymphatics, it completely stopped phasic contractions of thoracic duct at that concentration. Under isometric conditions the active peak and plateau components of tension were both significantly higher in thoracic duct compared to cervical lymphatics. ML-7 (10(-5) m) significantly decreased both the active peak and plateau tensions of thoracic duct, whereas only the active peak tension of cervical lymphatics was decreased. In thoracic duct MLC(20) di-phosphorylation, but not mono-phosphorylation, was significantly decreased with increasing transmural pressure, whereas in cervical vessels only at the higher pressures tested did MLC(20) di-phosphorylation decrease. ML-7 treatment of the thoracic duct caused a significant decrease in both the mono- and di-phosphorylated forms of MLC(20). However, in cervical vessels ML-7 treatment produced an increase in the mono-phosphorylated MLC(20) form while di-phosphorylated MLC(20) was significantly decreased. These data indicate that thoracic duct has an enhanced sensitivity to MLCK inhibition when compared to cervical lymphatics and while the status of the mono- and di-phosphorylation forms of MLC(20) affects both tonic and phasic components of lymphatic contractions, the pressure-dependent changes in tonic contractions are modulated by the status of the di-phosphorylation of MLC(20) in the lymphatics.

Indexed as

AnimalsAzepinesEnzyme InhibitorsIn Vitro TechniquesLymphatic SystemLymphatic VesselsMaleMuscle ContractionMyosin-Light-Chain KinaseMyosin Light ChainsNaphthalenesNeckPhosphorylationRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyThoracic DuctAzepinesEnzyme InhibitorsML 7Myosin-Light-Chain KinaseMyosin Light ChainsNaphthalenes

Identifiers

PMID21930597
PMCPMC3240881
OpenAlexW1531642080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.