Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21930160›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2012

Postmenopausal hormone use impact on emotion processing circuitry.

Tal Shafir, Tiffany Love, Alison Berent-Spillson, Carol C Persad, Heng Wang, Nancy K Reame, Kirk A Frey, Jon-Kar Zubieta, Yolanda R Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Sex differences and the neurobiology of affective disorders.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Anticipation of thermal pain in diverticular disease.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2016
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Sex differences in the neural correlates of affective experience.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tal ShafirMolecular and Behavioral Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Tiffany Love
Alison Berent-Spillson
Carol C Persad
Heng Wang
Nancy K Reame
Kirk A Frey
Jon-Kar Zubieta
Yolanda R Smith

Funding

MICHIGAN INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL AND HEALTH RESEARCH (MICHR) (UL1): (BPCA)UL1RR024986 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SHANLEY, THOMAS P. · 2007 to 2011
$51.2M
Regional Pilot And Feasibility Study Grants ProgramP30DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Martin G Myers · 2013 to 2026
$24.3M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN REPRODUCTIVE ENDOCRINOLOGYT32HD007048 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SMITH, GARY DANIEL · 1985 to 2009
$2.6M
Neurobiology of the Menopausal TransitionR01AG027675 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SMITH, YOLANDA R · 2006 to 2010
$1.3M
NEUROBIOLOGICAL EFFECT OF LONG-TERM ESTROGEN REPLACEMENTK23RR017043 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SMITH, YOLANDA R · 2002 to 2006
$672k
NCRR NIH HHS K23 RR017043NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024986NIA NIH HHS R01 AG027675NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007048NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite considerable evidence for potential effects of estrogen on emotional processing, several studies of postmenopausal women who began hormone therapy (HT) remote from menopause report no effects of HT on emotional measures. As early HT initiation may preserve brain mechanisms, we examined effects of HT on emotional processing in postmenopausal women who started HT early after menopause. We performed a cross-sectional comparison of 52 postmenopausal women 66±5 years old, including 15 users of conjugated equine estrogen, 20 users of conjugated equine estrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate, and 17 who never used hormones (NT). All hormone users started therapy within two years of menopause, and received at least 10 years of continuous therapy. Outcomes were fMRI-detected brain activity and behavioral measures during an emotional processing picture rating task. During processing of positive pictures, NT women had greater activation than estrogen treated women in medial prefrontal cortex extending to the anterior cingulate, and more activation than estrogen plus progestin treated women in the insula. During processing of negative pictures, estrogen treated women had higher activation than NT women in the entorhinal cortex. Current compared to past HT users showed greater activation in the hippocampus and higher emotion recognition accuracy of neutral stimuli. Estrogen plus progestin treated women had slower response time than NT women when rating all pictures. In conclusion, hormone use was associated with differences in brain functional responses during emotional processing. These fMRI effects were more prominent than those observed for behavioral measures and involved brain regions implicated in cognitive-emotional integration.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBrainBrain MappingEmotionsEstrogen Replacement TherapyEstrogens, Conjugated (USP)FemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMedroxyprogesterone AcetateMiddle AgedNeuroimagingPostmenopauseReaction TimeEstrogens, Conjugated (USP)Medroxyprogesterone Acetate

Identifiers

PMID21930160
PMCPMC3201705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.