ReviewUrologic oncology
Magnetic resonance spectroscopy: a promising tool for the diagnostics of human prostate cancer?
Review in Urologic oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ex Vivo High-Resolution Magic Angle Spinning (HRMAS)Cancers · 2022Article
- Comparing signal-to-noise ratio for prostate imaging at 7T and 3T.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2019Article
- MRS Shimming: An Important Point Which Should not be Ignored.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2018Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer clinical application.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProstate cancer (CaP) is one of the topmost diagnosed malignant diseases worldwide. In developed countries, early cancer detection methods have led to an increase of incidence rates over the last decades; however, with great variance of the prognosis. There is no diagnostic tool for an exact prediction of tumor aggressiveness, thus there is a lack of adequate and optimal treatment planning.
methodsElectronic databases (Medline, PubMed) were scanned for scientific literature. Basic concepts of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), important results and its clinical applications were extracted and reviewed in this article.
conclusionsMRS provides crucial information about the metabolic status of human prostate samples while preserving the specimens for further investigations. Single metabolites and metabolomic profiles can be quantified to distinguish benign from malignant tissue and to predict aggressiveness, such as the recurrence rates of CaP. Studies are also anticipating that MRS might be beneficially applicable for in vivo investigations in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.